Why a blood test would effect Pacquiao more than Mayweather..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ben d great
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 666
    • 9
    • 0
    • 6,804

    #101
    Originally posted by Aldo-Raine










































    A TEASPOON OF BLOOD DOES NOT WEAKEN YOU.

    Hahaha
    hehehe
    what else you can do you proved nohing

    Comment

    • Ben d great
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 666
      • 9
      • 0
      • 6,804

      #102
      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
      Honestly, I've been looking for that too. Someone posted this on here.
      Soy, the doctor can say that they are looking in the book, But what happen this time is not yet written in the book, not in the records that in the sports of Professional boxing had been studied the effect of blood testing. Therefore you cant say no effect to the person if the blood taaken in a certain span of time or day, but i can give you some athlete testimony, beware he is not even a boxer.

      Posted by Berdugo
      The latest breaking UK, US, world, business and sport news from The Times and The Sunday Times. Go beyond today's headlines with in-depth analysis and comment.


      Asafa Powell Jamaican athlete said

      “I accept how important it is but they’re really down on my case. I got pretty upset two days ago because since I have been here, they have tested me four times,” he said. “They’ve taken so much blood from us we’re going to be very weak before the final.”

      Comment

      • Easy-E
        Gotta want it
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 22686
        • 865
        • 1,739
        • 32,777

        #103
        what a crock of ****. Having blood extracted will AFFECT them both the same physically, and if Manny is ****** enough to be mentally affected, it is his problem.

        Comment

        • Doctor_Tenma
          Monster
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 33313
          • 1,327
          • 1,249
          • 58,127

          #104
          Originally posted by Ben d great
          Soy, the doctor can say that they are looking in the book, But what happen this time is not yet written in the book, not in the records that in the sports of Professional boxing had been studied the effect of blood testing. Therefore you cant say no effect to the person if the blood taaken in a certain span of time or day, but i can give you some athlete testimony, beware he is not even a boxer.

          Posted by Berdugo
          The latest breaking UK, US, world, business and sport news from The Times and The Sunday Times. Go beyond today's headlines with in-depth analysis and comment.


          Asafa Powell Jamaican athlete said

          “I accept how important it is but they’re really down on my case. I got pretty upset two days ago because since I have been here, they have tested me four times,” he said. “They’ve taken so much blood from us we’re going to be very weak before the final.”
          Listen, no excuse to ask for a 30 day cut off.

          Comment

          • RedWhiteBlue
            Contender
            • Jan 2010
            • 411
            • 9
            • 0
            • 6,752

            #105
            fellas fellas fellas
            Tomorrow is Monday and we will here some news...
            Someone budged...

            Comment

            • kalandagan
              Amateur
              • Nov 2008
              • 18
              • 5
              • 0
              • 6,053

              #106
              It's the PLACEBO effect, R&D of drug companies acknowledges that such thing exists. It is also highly improbable that a person can be gifted both mentally and physically, nature wouldn't allow it because it'll take up too much energy. Have you noticed that highly intelligent persons are usually mentally handicapped and vice-versa. Now if Roach could just convince Pac that random blood test would make him stronger then Floyd's gonna be in trouble big time, lol.

              Comment

              • Ben d great
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 666
                • 9
                • 0
                • 6,804

                #107
                Originally posted by Easy-E
                what a crock of ****. Having blood extracted will AFFECT them both the same physically, and if Manny is ****** enough to be mentally affected, it is his problem.

                Thats why he made it clear he wont fight on that way of testing , Do you have problem on that. I believe he has the right to say NO because that testing style is not the the commission rules.

                Comment

                • big_james10
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2007
                  • 6809
                  • 319
                  • 39
                  • 13,287

                  #108
                  Originally posted by Sin City
                  I hear the same bull**** over and over from narrow minded Floyd fans or as I call them (The John Birch Society) saying that Mayweather is going through the same tests Pacquiao is so it would effect them equally.

                  Well, if they actual took time to get their heads out of their ass and breath some fresh air they would know that it isn't the amount of blood being withdrawn or the physical effects of it.. it's the mental.

                  See Pacquiao, unlike Mayweather, believes getting blood extracted weakens him and he believes this strongly since he had blood extracted days before the Morales fight which he lost. Personally, I think Morales was the better man.. Pacquiao in his head however doesn't think so.

                  Mayweather is confident he will be ok with the tests.. since he believes in them.
                  Pacquiao doesn't and therefor doubts it.

                  You ever gave a child Flindstones tablets and told them.. they could run, jump and play stronger and faster because of it? They went out there thinking they were superman and therefor performed better because of it. This is pretty much the same damn thing. Only difference is it involves something weakening you rather than making you stronger and it's between two adults.

                  This is the biggest piece of bull**** I have seen on this subject since the debate started. Pac took a damn blood test three weeks before the Hatton fight and it didn't affect him mentally. Everyone has problems and issues they have to deal with. If you are a professional, you don't allow small issues like this to affect you mentally. You put it out of your mind and do what you need to do. That applies to people in virtually all professions, not just sports. This bull**** about it affecting him mentally is an excuse, nothing more. a child will believe anything coming from an authority figure, especially a parent. Only a 12 year old or a person with the mentality of a 12 year-old would actually believe this crap about blood work affecting him mentally.

                  Comment

                  • jqSide
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 5232
                    • 551
                    • 166
                    • 11,252

                    #109
                    Originally posted by big_james10
                    This is the biggest piece of bull**** I have seen on this subject since the debate started. Pac took a damn blood test three weeks before the Hatton fight and it didn't affect him mentally. Everyone has problems and issues they have to deal with. If you are a professional, you don't allow small issues like this to affect you mentally. You put it out of your mind and do what you need to do. That applies to people in virtually all professions, not just sports. This bull**** about it affecting him mentally is an excuse, nothing more. a child will believe anything coming from an authority figure, especially a parent. Only a 12 year old or a person with the mentality of a 12 year-old would actually believe this crap about blood work affecting him mentally.
                    What's even bigger bull**** is the thought that you could hide that ped **** in an event as huge as fights where big names are in it without getting caught. I'll have to be convinced by walking me through the process, how to mix it, when to take it, where to hide it, etc. etc. If you people are fair you point your fingers where this crap all started. Boxing doesn't need cleaning by people who are known to be ducking fights.

                    Comment

                    • The Guillotine
                      ****** DONOR
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 497
                      • 37
                      • 189
                      • 6,604

                      #110
                      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                      The issue is, only an idiot would buy into the "It will mentally effect him" crap. As I said; issue was more due to the fact that Pacquiao was already in the 130 mark and didn't eat after getting his blood drawn. This was during a period where his body needed rest. That was at 130, difference there. At WW he came in at 143 against Cotto, so Pacquiao doesn't have to worry about that, understand? The problem here is that a 30 day cut off solve nothing, a 2-3 day cut off does, you understand that also? No offense man.
                      it's kind of like the placeibo effect. i have a feeling you dont know what that is, so look it up and learn something son. The placebo effect points to the importance of perception and the brain's role in physical health.

                      to say that it would not effect pac mentally is laughable in so many ways. this only proves you post hear in order to get attention, not to make a discernible argument.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP