Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Has The Better Resume at 147 Pacquiao or Floyd?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View Post
    I picked Pacquiao because Floyd is celebrating his 5 years anniversary in the WW Division and he can't even fight a F U C K I N G Welterweight.

    Pacquiao was at 130 lb last year and he fought Cotto way before Floyd did.. Pacquiao is willing to fight Cotto, Margarito and Mosley something Floyd will never have the balls to call out their name.
    hehehe heeeeee great post green sent lol

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
      I honestly do not give that much credit to Pac for that win. I do give him creidit on how he won, like how dominant, and how great he looked. Nobody thought it was going to be that easy. So I give him credit on how he did it. But, not on the win if that makes any sense? Because, really Oscar was old. I think his prime began when he beat Rafael Ruelas in the mid 90's. I even think Oscar was passed his prime but still good enough when he fought Vargas. And, I felt after the Mosley rematch that was when he was done being a fighter and started focusing more on being a promoter. And, when he fought Mosley that was like 2002/2003? And, he was already passed his prime then and he fougth Pac in 2008. He was damn near shot.

      I don't make that big of deal of the catch-weight cuz it has happened before. Chavez-Whitaker fought at the same catch-weight. So it has happened through out history and other fighters have gotten. So I will give credit to Pac too. I don't look at the catch-weight as that big of a deal. And, as of right now I do consider the Cotto win high. But, it also depends on what Cotto does after this. If Cotto losses to a bum next. Then you have to re-valuate how good Cotto was against Pac. But, if Cotto some how get back to the top wins another title has a few more good wins against top fighters. Then Pac should get full credit for that win.
      good point ill take that

      Comment


      • #23
        pac 1 fight at ww is greater than floyd 5 years at ww, that's how bad resume at ww is.

        Comment


        • #24
          Nice Poll Results.

          Comment


          • #25
            This Forums are getting worst every day...*******s pouring out of the screen...daaamn

            The post doesn´t deserve a single more word.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
              You can't say Cotto ain't ****. He was a risk... Cotto resume at WW ****s on Pac WW resume, Floyd WW resume, maybe even Shane resume at WW. You can't say Cotto ain't ****. I just disagree, I can't see that.
              He is a good fighter and it was a huge risk but compared to the likes of Oscar, Morales, Barrera etc he just isn't up there imo, saying that Cotto's resume win or lose is a who's who of the WW division over the past 5 years.

              That's why Pacs resume 147 is better now i look at it more

              147 and above Floyd's is

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP