Originally posted by MakeDamnSure
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who Has The Better Resume at 147 Pacquiao or Floyd?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostI honestly do not give that much credit to Pac for that win. I do give him creidit on how he won, like how dominant, and how great he looked. Nobody thought it was going to be that easy. So I give him credit on how he did it. But, not on the win if that makes any sense? Because, really Oscar was old. I think his prime began when he beat Rafael Ruelas in the mid 90's. I even think Oscar was passed his prime but still good enough when he fought Vargas. And, I felt after the Mosley rematch that was when he was done being a fighter and started focusing more on being a promoter. And, when he fought Mosley that was like 2002/2003? And, he was already passed his prime then and he fougth Pac in 2008. He was damn near shot.
I don't make that big of deal of the catch-weight cuz it has happened before. Chavez-Whitaker fought at the same catch-weight. So it has happened through out history and other fighters have gotten. So I will give credit to Pac too. I don't look at the catch-weight as that big of a deal. And, as of right now I do consider the Cotto win high. But, it also depends on what Cotto does after this. If Cotto losses to a bum next. Then you have to re-valuate how good Cotto was against Pac. But, if Cotto some how get back to the top wins another title has a few more good wins against top fighters. Then Pac should get full credit for that win.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostYou can't say Cotto ain't ****. He was a risk... Cotto resume at WW ****s on Pac WW resume, Floyd WW resume, maybe even Shane resume at WW. You can't say Cotto ain't ****. I just disagree, I can't see that.
That's why Pacs resume 147 is better now i look at it more
147 and above Floyd's is
Comment
Comment