Originally posted by chicano79us
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao's Lawyer: The Defendants Have Zero Evidence
Collapse
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostGuilty until proven innocent? He can submit all of the drug tests administered by the Nevada Commission.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lac'em up View PostI agree with you totally, and now I really hope this fight never happens because Floyd will have a void in his carreer, a doubt sort to speek for not fighting the best. At this point in their carreers Floyd needs Pacman, but Pacman can continue fighting without Floyd and still have a great legacy. Floyd is acting like a spoiled brat and by asking for all these tests he is showing a lack of confidence in my opinion. I say this because why didn't he make these demands with say " DLH "? Because he had no doubt that he would beat DLH, but now there is the doubt that he can lose to Pacquiao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostHow is serious sexual misconduct involved? Maybe this story has more to it then I knew about?
Anyways I probably know more about the law then you but I am not a lawyer so I don't really care or want argue about it. Manny's side needs to prove their case all the defendents need to do is provide doubt to that case.
It is nowhere near as simple as you are making it sound.
You know more about the law than either myself or anyone else, yet you spelled "defendant" incorrectly. I work at a law firm and just prepped for the LSAT's, but don't let logic get in the way of a good debate.Last edited by switchsouthpaw; 12-31-2009, 09:22 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by raiders1217 View Postyour opinion is totally one sided, pac haters, I am not a Pac fan but a boxing fan, if it was the other way around where Pac demanded Floyd to take a blood test or any other test, do you think Floyd would do it? No, he's gonna say "I am the champ the best ever, pound for pound king, who are you to dictate me on what to do?" The only way to clean this mess is to have it mandatory by all boxing commission to have a random blood testing for all boxers amateur or professional. Why have amateur testing when the two boxers are both professional boxers?
Comment
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostI think you misread my comments, because I'm in agreement with you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by raiders1217 View Postmy apology if that is the case, my opinion is just that all these forums about pacquiao on PEDs or ROIDS, guilty right away. I could see the arguments for both fans' side. But, if you accuse somebody of roid, you should be man enough to admit it. Now that they formally file the suit in court, Mayweather and GBP is claiming that they did not make any accusations nor any misleading statements or opinions that Pac is on PED/Roids when their quoted so many times on the internet. Pacquiao on the other should have just say at the beginning that I am not taking the test because it's not mandatory by any commission, period, not some excuse about afraid of needle or getting weak from getting a blood test.
Comment
-
If Jr. did not take seriously forgotten trainer Sr., they could now in their fight promo period. This african-american who wants american to support him in the fight with not american pacman. But dont believe in the integrity of americans who heads the drug testing in boxing
Comment
-
Originally posted by Amadla Ngawethu View PostThe court deals with evidence
Comment
Comment