Comments Thread For: Miguel Cotto: "Pacquiao's Refusal Raises Questions"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrsjt
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 139
    • 2
    • 0
    • 6,191

    #291
    miguel is a class act.
    Last edited by mrsjt; 12-29-2009, 05:51 PM. Reason: posted in wrong thread

    Comment

    • bray26
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 208
      • 15
      • 8
      • 8,619

      #292
      Originally posted by GRUSTLER
      Miguel Cotto is dead up speaking the truth. Can't hate him for that.
      What's up Grus? Glad I found u on here. Give me tour honest opinion! Are u getting the feeingl Arum thru Cotto under the bus for both of his career losses? First loaded gloves, now Peds! And with guys under the same banner! He's got to be shell shocked! Their can't be any trust in that relationship anymore! Next it's this May-Pac circus! What's your take?

      Comment

      • dexter_sativum
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 1
        • 0
        • 0
        • 6,012

        #293
        maybe you should hear it from roy jones jr. more credible than miguel cotto which was beaten by pac .. ROY JONES JR SIDES WITH PACQUIAO: "I WOULDN'T TAKE ANY EXTRA TESTS!"
        By G. Leon

        GL: Are you aware of the ongoing crisis surrounding the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight? "Most definitely." GL: Do you have an opinion on it? "You could see Pacquiao's side, why should he change for Floyd? A fight don't start in the ring, it starts when the negotiation starts. If these are the rules, we're going to stick by the standard rules. On the other hand, I understand he's saying something been going on, but the problem with that is, if you're going to check him why didn't you check Marquez? Why didn't you make anybody else do it? It's kind of strange to call him out on this and nobody else."

        GL: Do you see anything in Pacquiao that would lead you to feel su****ious?

        RJ: "No. The kid is strong, he came up in weight and brought his stregth. Nowadays the testing is good enough, they got it to where you can't even take over the counter products. I can testify to that. The testing is very good right now and there's nothing he could really do that they can't find. Why make Pacquiao take the test and not anybody else?"

        GL: Would you have made such a concession for John Ruiz or any of your other big fights?

        RJ: "Hell naw. Why change the rules on me? Because I'm coming up in weight means I'm doing steroids? They're giving you a test for that anyway. It would be something that would aggravate me because then after I beat you, I was on something, don't play with me. Either you want to fight or you don't want to fight.

        Comment

        • Left2body
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 6200
          • 269
          • 277
          • 13,212

          #294
          Originally posted by Xeraser
          Pac already agreed to unlimited random urine test. Urine test is better in detecting EPO than blood test.
          Not according to Conte who made his LIVING and loads of money on beating test and staying 2 steps ahead of testers. Conte states that blood test is "...more important..."

          Read the quotation:

          :'In my opinion, blood testing for the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight is more important for detecting possible blood doping or use of EPO than it is for human growth hormone. Measuring hematocrit levels (percentage of red blood cells to total whole blood volume) is very important. For example, even without a positive urine test for EPO, cyclists are temporarily suspended for two weeks if their hematocrit is greater than 50%. An elevated hematocrit can provide a significant advantage to a fighter by enhancing oxygen uptake and utilization. This would benefit a fighter in training and especially during the later rounds of a fight."

          Comment

          • Ch@mpBox@PR
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 21432
            • 432
            • 279
            • 22,261

            #295
            Again, this is why Miguel "Angel" Cotto is My favorite fighter!!!!

            Comment

            • TheTruthHurts
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • May 2009
              • 49
              • 11
              • 20
              • 6,066

              #296

              ***********


              Comment

              • V.WEBB
                CBVM
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 14329
                • 621
                • 174
                • 21,453

                #297
                this comment from Miguel doesn't surprise me...and I believe that the majority of those that follow this sport agrees with Cotto's statement..."Pacquiao's refusal raises questions." Also, the US media seems to feel the same way and they will be all over this story until something changes.

                Comment

                • StarRican
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 208
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  • 6,275

                  #298
                  Originally posted by Xeraser
                  No it doesn't. Show me any published research study that indicates HGH increase athletic performance. Even Conte who manufactures PEDs ddeosnt even think highly of HGH.
                  Then whu is it banned and why so many athletes use it?! Damm idiot!

                  Comment

                  • Cash Cow
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 7662
                    • 342
                    • 396
                    • 8,143

                    #299
                    Originally posted by COACH V. WEBB
                    this comment from Miguel doesn't surprise me...and I believe that the majority of those that follow this sport agrees with Cotto's statement..."Pacquiao's refusal raises questions." Also, the US media seems to feel the same way and they will be all over this story until something changes.


                    Comment

                    • Cash Cow
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 7662
                      • 342
                      • 396
                      • 8,143

                      #300
                      Originally posted by TheTruthHurts

                      ***********


                      Fanny Pacquiao...lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP