Lol now legacy is defined solely by what you do in the present? The past now gets swept under the rug when examining the totality of someone's career?
Nothing about the last five years at welterweight means anything to you? Yet on one hand you presume Pac to be guilty of taking PEDs and why? Because you're basing if off his "past" successes.
Mayweather is asking for these tests based on Manny's success of the past and now when choosing to focus on Mayweather we must now solely look at the present and not his past, does that make sense?
Is Mayweather asking for these additional tests based on the present or past successes of Manny?<----you answer that question.
Nothing about the last five years at welterweight means anything to you? Yet on one hand you presume Pac to be guilty of taking PEDs and why? Because you're basing if off his "past" successes.
Mayweather is asking for these tests based on Manny's success of the past and now when choosing to focus on Mayweather we must now solely look at the present and not his past, does that make sense?
Is Mayweather asking for these additional tests based on the present or past successes of Manny?<----you answer that question.

Comment