Lawsuit? How ****** are they?? LOL

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • S A M U R A I
    Bulletproof
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 181694
    • 1,495
    • 1,324
    • 1,419,318

    #31




    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

    Comment

    • Calilloyd
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 4373
      • 124
      • 292
      • 10,868

      #32
      Originally posted by jantzen212003
      This guy wants to be a politician and we know how that always turns out.
      LOL! good point.

      Comment

      • Haglerwins
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 2528
        • 90
        • 40
        • 9,195

        #33
        Originally posted by tudedude
        Actually, it won't be.

        This case isn't going to be about Manny having to prove he's not on drugs. It's not about Manny. It's about May SR and if he is indeed guilty about the 2 points presented in the original post.
        Mayweather originally stated when he was videoed that it was his opinion that Manny was on steroids.

        They have no case.

        Comment

        • Doctor_Tenma
          Monster
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 33313
          • 1,327
          • 1,249
          • 58,127

          #34
          Originally posted by Calilloyd
          I've been saying that for a while.
          Same here man. For a very long time, Pacquiao has come off as fake to me. Not to offend the dude but that's my honest opinion, glad I'm not alone in thinking that.

          Comment

          • Doctor_Tenma
            Monster
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 33313
            • 1,327
            • 1,249
            • 58,127

            #35
            Originally posted by S a m u r a i
            Ok now this was funnier

            Comment

            • OnePunch
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 9081
              • 1,295
              • 748
              • 2,453,131

              #36
              Originally posted by tudedude
              actually they do have a solid case. There has been no reason for the accusation..no locker room talk, rumors, or witnesses. He's passed all drug tests, and has a perfect history.

              It's pretty much like accusing the local catholic priest of ******ation just because you think he looks dodgy. You can go ahead and say it's not slander because there's no way to know for sure if the priest never ******ed a child because , who knows what he's doing on his off hours? He may have ******ed a kid.. we can't say with 100% certainly that he hasn't touched Johnny in that special place can we? Meanwhile because of these slanders the parish sees an 80% decline in patronage based on pure BS.

              Also they are doing it with the intent to damage the credibility.. the whole Olympic drug testing demand is a result of a damage to his credibility. The fact that they’re using the accusation as a bargaining tool in the fight proves it.. because this type of leverage depends upon Manny’s credibility being put into question.

              Mayweather SR is going to jail.. easy case.
              Good points, but what you are missing is that Pac falls under the "public figure" catagory, which has a higher burden of proof put on the plaintiff. A "public figure" has to be able to PROVE that the other party (in this case Mayweather Sr) KNEW that the statement was false. That is impossible to prove, because Sr. would have no way of knowing with absolute certainty one way or the other if Pac is or was ever taking steroids.

              Comment

              • peyk-peyk
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2009
                • 9514
                • 5,060
                • 10,032
                • 38,001

                #37
                Originally posted by OnePunch
                Good points, but what you are missing is that Pac falls under the "public figure" catagory, which has a higher burden of proof put on the plaintiff. A "public figure" has to be able to PROVE that the other party (in this case Mayweather Sr) KNEW that the statement was false. That is impossible to prove, because Sr. would have no way of knowing with absolute certainty one way or the other if Pac is or was ever taking steroids.
                OK attorney whatevah you say...

                Comment

                • DonTaseMeBrah
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 5828
                  • 683
                  • 575
                  • 6,409

                  #38
                  Originally posted by FELiX STURM
                  You're such a ****ty poster man,every time you come up with those ****** allegations and comments because your anger blinds you my son.

                  What is the judge gonna do? Pacquiao had only one move and this is it a bit** move if you ask me..he thinks people are gonna forget about him not taking a blood test with 50 mill dollaz involved.

                  This is not the time for fairy tales..take the test or be exposed simple as that.
                  are you ignorant or ******? there is a difference.


                  If you are ignorant then i must inform you so you cease to be ignorant that pac never denied taking a blood test, he's willing to take multiple blood tests 30 days before the fight & after the fight. im pretty sure it has changed since this story has unfolded to 3 days to a week before the fight & after the fight.

                  This is public record.


                  If you cannot get that, then you are suffering from a sad case of ******ity which i cannot help you with.
                  Last edited by DonTaseMeBrah; 12-25-2009, 03:19 AM.

                  Comment

                  • DiLLiNGER
                    Banned
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 6093
                    • 324
                    • 423
                    • 7,749

                    #39
                    Originally posted by S a m u r a i
                    Good to see the picture made its mark but a Weak comeback..us floyd fans are original we don't use pictures already used.

                    Comment

                    • TheSurgeonMDMPH
                      Manny Pacquiao The Best
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 4632
                      • 190
                      • 37
                      • 10,972

                      #40
                      Originally posted by OnePunch
                      Good points, but what you are missing is that Pac falls under the "public figure" catagory, which has a higher burden of proof put on the plaintiff. A "public figure" has to be able to PROVE that the other party (in this case Mayweather Sr) KNEW that the statement was false. That is impossible to prove, because Sr. would have no way of knowing with absolute certainty one way or the other if Pac is or was ever taking steroids.
                      especially when he refuses the most accurate regimen of testing known to man due to his "powers possibly being drained"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP