To prevail in a slander or defamation case, TWO elements BOTH have to be proven:
1. That the party making the statement knew, or should have known, that the statement was false, and
2. The party made the statement with the intent to purposely damage the credibility or image of the other party.
neither Mayweather Sr. or Golden Boy could possibly know that their opinion was false, as Pac has never been subjected to testing that would conclusively prove or disprove the steroid allegation. And Pacquiao cannot prove he has NEVER taken steroids, therefore he cannot even prove the allegation itself is false, much less the intent of those saying it
It's impossible to prove a negative. It's like trying to prove you didnt drink a beer 4 years ago. It cant be done.
Where is he getting his legal advice from? Juan Diaz? lolol
Accutaly their made in the wild card gym kitchen..they got 7 people runnin the **** in the back rooms..kontc looks like a heavy drug abuser..he probly advised pacquiao to file the lawsuit haha
actually they do have a solid case. There has been no reason for the accusation..no locker room talk, rumors, or witnesses. He's passed all drug tests, and has a perfect history.
It's pretty much like accusing the local catholic priest of ******ation just because you think he looks dodgy. You can go ahead and say it's not slander because there's no way to know for sure if the priest never ******ed a child because , who knows what he's doing on his off hours? He may have ******ed a kid.. we can't say with 100% certainly that he hasn't touched Johnny in that special place can we? Meanwhile because of these slanders the parish sees an 80% decline in patronage based on pure BS.
Also they are doing it with the intent to damage the credibility.. the whole Olympic drug testing demand is a result of a damage to his credibility. The fact that they’re using the accusation as a bargaining tool in the fight proves it.. because this type of leverage depends upon Manny’s credibility being put into question.
To prevail in a slander or defamation case, TWO elements BOTH have to be proven:
1. That the party making the statement knew, or should have known, that the statement was false, and
2. The party made the statement with the intent to purposely damage the credibility or image of the other party.
neither Mayweather Sr. or Golden Boy could possibly know that their opinion was false, as Pac has never been subjected to testing that would conclusively prove or disprove the steroid allegation. And Pacquiao cannot prove he has NEVER taken steroids, therefore he cannot even prove the allegation itself is false, much less the intent of those saying it
It's impossible to prove a negative. It's like trying to prove you didnt drink a beer 4 years ago. It cant be done.
Where is he getting his legal advice from? Juan Diaz? lolol
well considering the fact that he has passed every test & there is absolutely no evidence of steroid use they will win this case in court, so its very smart & not ****** at all.
& considering the fact that all parties involved are rich & famous while you are not, if you say they are ****** then what the hell does that make you?
Comment