Olympic testing is a joke. Man up Mayweather management

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bring It On
    Rest in peace Emanuel
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 3514
    • 91
    • 56
    • 9,970

    #51
    Originally posted by The Stone Roses
    you're avatar is proof that you have a biased opinion so you shouldn't be posting in such threads.....its obvious that you have a hatred for mayweather so there's no point in trying to have an intelligent discussion with you
    You're avatar is proof that you are ******ed.

    You can't have an intelligent discussion because of 1) You're not intelligent and 2) You don't know **** about steroids or testing.

    Just admit that you had no idea that THG couldn't be detected back then.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #52
      Originally posted by MOREBASS
      I think this is the gist of the problem that they have with this testing.


      Why all of a sudden should they have to do something that has never been done before, without any factual reason to do so?

      I would understand the concern if:

      1) Manny Pacquiao hadn't passed ever single drug test he's taken

      2) The NSAC's drug testing has been in question


      But the basis of the argument was on an assumption, that a fighter could not possibly be performing the way that he has per Floyd Mayweather Sr.
      The NSAC has been in question since forever. You wouldn't know because you started watching boxing the first time you heard of Pacquiao. Wake up and throw your bias in the bin

      Comment

      • GREEN GIANT
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 154
        • 14
        • 9
        • 259

        #53
        Originally posted by MOREBASS
        I think this is the gist of the problem that they have with this testing.


        Why all of a sudden should they have to do something that has never been done before, without any factual reason to do so?

        I would understand the concern if:

        1) Manny Pacquiao hadn't passed ever single drug test he's taken

        2) The NSAC's drug testing has been in question


        But the basis of the argument was on an assumption, that a fighter could not possibly be performing the way that he has per Floyd Mayweather Sr.
        i have no problem with Pacquiao's history of testing. But the NSAC drug testing is a joke. Its too easy to cheat. This should be the fight that changes tasting in boxing, and the accuse of its never been done before is a weak argument.

        Comment

        • M.I Truth ?
          Truth Personified
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2006
          • 3204
          • 142
          • 216
          • 9,854

          #54
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          If Olympic testing is a joke, then what's boxing testing? A satire?

          Comment

          • MOREBASS
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2006
            • 1416
            • 58
            • 30
            • 7,933

            #55
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            The NSAC has been in question since forever. You wouldn't know because you started watching boxing the first time you heard of Pacquiao. Wake up and throw your bias in the bin

            I've been watching boxing for over 20 years.


            So are you saying that the USADA has never been comprimised?


            The same substances that got passed the NSAC were also the same ones that Marion Jones used to win her Gold Medal in the Olympics.


            The fact of the matter is that neither style of testing is full proof, and the only one that is required is the one by the commission who is sanctioning the fight.

            Team Pacquiao didn't flat out say 'NO' to the testing. But did you really expect them to just bend over to Floyd's demands and give up that mental edge. Its all a part of the negotiations, and I think it has less to do with the actual testing, than it does posturing.

            Comment

            • Ch@mpBox@PR
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 21432
              • 432
              • 279
              • 22,261

              #56
              Originally posted by The Stone Roses
              Pacquiao is at no disadvantage....Mayweather will be taking the same tests...i dont see the issue here....what seems more ridiculous.....mayweather asking for extra drug tests or pacquiao demanding 10 million per pound over 147??? and the funy thing is,Mayweather agreed to pacquiao's demands...HAHHHA...pacquiao is the one holding this fight up, now that is funny
              Nothing more should be said reallY!!!

              Comment

              • Ch@mpBox@PR
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 21432
                • 432
                • 279
                • 22,261

                #57
                Originally posted by MOREBASS
                I've been watching boxing for over 20 years.


                So are you saying that the USADA has never been comprimised?


                The same substances that got passed the NSAC were also the same ones that Marion Jones used to win her Gold Medal in the Olympics.


                The fact of the matter is that neither style of testing is full proof, and the only one that is required is the one by the commission who is sanctioning the fight.

                Team Pacquiao didn't flat out say 'NO' to the testing. But did you really expect them to just bend over to Floyd's demands and give up that mental edge. Its all a part of the negotiations, and I think it has less to do with the actual testing, than it does posturing.
                Yes because at 6, you were watching boxing, right? *** outta here!!!!

                Comment

                • MOREBASS
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 1416
                  • 58
                  • 30
                  • 7,933

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
                  Yes because at 6, you were watching boxing, right? *** outta here!!!!
                  Actually I was, but do I really give a **** if some chump off the internet believes me?



                  Anyways, I used to watch fights in the 80's with my grandfather who is and still is a huge boxing fan.

                  Comment

                  • Modobo3
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 256
                    • 16
                    • 7
                    • 6,608

                    #59
                    Bottomline...Unfortunately over the last year or so, many people have suspected Manny of using PEDs...and because of being suspected, he's being asked to take this type of testing...

                    If both fighters are agreeing to the testing - I don't know what's the big deal???

                    Mayweather agreed to the 10 million, if he's overweight???

                    To me...This is all postering...

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #60
                      Originally posted by MOREBASS
                      I've been watching boxing for over 20 years.


                      So are you saying that the USADA has never been comprimised?


                      The same substances that got passed the NSAC were also the same ones that Marion Jones used to win her Gold Medal in the Olympics.


                      The fact of the matter is that neither style of testing is full proof, and the only one that is required is the one by the commission who is sanctioning the fight.

                      Team Pacquiao didn't flat out say 'NO' to the testing. But did you really expect them to just bend over to Floyd's demands and give up that mental edge. Its all a part of the negotiations, and I think it has less to do with the actual testing, than it does posturing.
                      So ****ing what if neither test is foolproof? One of them is primitive while the other one, at the very least, is a START. Not giving in to Floyd's demands? The irony of a Pacquiao apologist spewing this crap. If you agree to OLYMPIC STYLED TESTING, THEN YOU AGREE. You can't decide when and which tests you'd like to take, wtf? That's PACQUIAO STYLED TESTING. Jesus Christ, you clowns disgust me. Luckily, most of you will disappear when he retired because you damn sure aren't boxing fans.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP