I like Khan but let's wait until he fights an Alexander, Maidana, Ortiz, Malinaggi, or Marquez before we crown him as the best british boxer of the year. He's not even close to being ready for Bradley.
British boxer of the year..
Collapse
-
-
i think youve missed out on matthew macklin - hes shown that you can come back from a defeat and still challnge for the top honours. hes now being linked with other top MW's like sylvester and mundine.
personally i think haye has a very good chance but remember that he has only had just one fight. granted it was for a HW title and he performed admirably and surprised alot of people with his ring IQ.
khan and froch both have a good chance because both have faced top 10 fighters in their weight divisions. khan in particular because he has shown improvement and has come back from a humbling loss. froch with his wins over taylor and dirrell also has a very good chance.
imo it should go to ryan rhodes. he was involved in a thriller of a fight where the momentum swung from fighter to the other. hes shown that you can come back from a loss and he proved alot of naysayers wrong.Comment
-
-
Jason Booth, moved up a division and beat the living crap out of 2 of the top british fighters in his new division 2 years after everyone said his career was effectively over.Comment
-
haye or khan,froch lost by 4 rounds to dirrel and only got the nod because he was fighting in englandComment
-
Carl Froch has the best wins, even if the way he got them were not that impressive.
Amir Khan has made the best comeback, and his win over Kotelnik is an underrated performance.
David Haye only fought once, it was a good, if not great win.
Overall i would say
1.Khan
2.Froch
3.HayeComment
-
id say khan
3 wins 2 of which were impressive imo,stepping up in weight too pick up a world title,at a young age aswell
haye had the best win overall but that was his only fight this year
froch didnt deserve the decision against dirrell so that eliminates him from the runningComment
Comment