We all do acknowledge that Pac is not physically a WW right?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spray_resistant
    Vacant interim regular(C)
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 29599
    • 2,970
    • 1,565
    • 53,384

    #111
    Originally posted by DLT
    well again, was Floyd doing that when he was coming in at 146 and being outweighed by 20 pounds? If Floyd is smaller now was he the bigger man when he was the same size at SFW? Are you going to aknowledge that?
    He had more time than Pac to physically mature as he was younger when he started moving from SFW to WW but yes he did go into a few fights as the smaller man but now is not a small ww and is a naturally bigger man than Pac. Even still it should have no bearing on their fight as Pac demolished top 147 comp so he is viable comp for Floyd.

    Comment

    • Spray_resistant
      Vacant interim regular(C)
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 29599
      • 2,970
      • 1,565
      • 53,384

      #112
      Originally posted by King Burner
      If Pac is great then he should beat Floyd........

      Great fighters beat bigger fighters then themselves........

      ***** ass Pac tards making execuses..........

      Pac can fight Cotto who is bigger, stronger and hits harder then Mayweather but hes too smal for Floyd..a guy who doesnt hit hard at all....

      EXECUSES....

      Pac signed the fight and Floyd is going to beat the ****ing **** out of his wild, skilless ass.
      Did you even read my OP? this has nothing at all to do with Floyd. This is all about Pac and just his natural size it doesn't matter if he can beat any WW, SWW, or MW even.....he is still close enough in size to fight at JWW is he wanted. So what are you going to say he is too big to fight Hatton who was heavier than him in the ring actually, or Bradley or Kahn now.....my intent here has gone way over some of your heads it seems.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #113
        Pacquiao is a full fledged welter.

        Comment

        • Spray_resistant
          Vacant interim regular(C)
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 29599
          • 2,970
          • 1,565
          • 53,384

          #114
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          Pacquiao is a full fledged welter.
          So he is too big to fight Hatton again you are saying?

          Comment

          • DLT
            DMV
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 17087
            • 737
            • 35
            • 24,277

            #115
            Originally posted by Spray_resistant
            So he is too big to fight Hatton again you are saying?
            ****, Hatton was 159 in the ring against Collazo

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #116
              Originally posted by Spray_resistant
              So he is too big to fight Hatton again you are saying?
              Huh? Too big to fight Hatton? Who's talking about Hatton? He shouldn't be fighting anyone good anyway.

              Comment

              • Spray_resistant
                Vacant interim regular(C)
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 29599
                • 2,970
                • 1,565
                • 53,384

                #117
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                Huh? Too big to fight Hatton? Who's talking about Hatton? He shouldn't be fighting anyone good anyway.
                I am speaking strictly physical size wise......everyone for the sake of this argument needs to forget about skills and ability or boxing status and just concentrate on natural size here. I see no reason why he could not fight a big LW Funeka who came in against Guzman at 154 or Guzman who came in at 149 same as Pac usually comes into fights regardless of weight.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #118
                  Originally posted by Spray_resistant
                  I am speaking strictly physical size wise......everyone for the sake of this argument needs to forget about skills and ability or boxing status and just concentrate on natural size here. I see no reason why he could not fight a big LW Funeka who came in against Guzman at 154 or Guzman who came in at 149 same as Pac usually comes into fights regardless of weight.
                  Well how much they weigh during the fight isn't what I'm looking at. Pac is a welter. He's fought over 140 a couple times now and has looked as strong as some of the strongest welters. He's a full fledged welter. Not sure what that has to do with him fighting Hatton again...

                  Comment

                  • Spray_resistant
                    Vacant interim regular(C)
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 29599
                    • 2,970
                    • 1,565
                    • 53,384

                    #119
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    Well how much they weigh during the fight isn't what I'm looking at. Pac is a welter. He's fought over 140 a couple times now and has looked as strong as some of the strongest welters. He's a full fledged welter. Not sure what that has to do with him fighting Hatton again...
                    Well that is what I am looking at because ppl are basically saying he can't fight these guys at lower division who are the same size as him because he has fought bigger guys before.....no one has given me a satisfactory explanation as to why? I thought the point of weight classes was to box fighters of the same size into categories to ensure fair competition. Would it now be unfair for him to fight guys his own size just because it is presumed that he would probably demolish them?

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Spray_resistant
                      Well that is what I am looking at because ppl are basically saying he can't fight these guys at lower division who are the same size as him because he has fought bigger guys before.....no one has given me a satisfactory explanation as to why? I thought the point of weight classes was to box fighters of the same size into categories to ensure fair competition. Would it now be unfair for him to fight guys his own size just because it is presumed that he would probably demolish them?
                      He can fight them just fine. I don't have an issue with it. Just depends on who. Bradley at 140? Sure. Hatton? Umm...no.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP