FROCH CALLS OUT CALZAGHE-Will Calzaghe come back 2010?
Collapse
-
ughh
this is the only fighter that is highly rated that i will say.. is just plain terrible.. froch is just terrible. Only word to describe his boxing style.Comment
-
No Calzaghe is afraid to lose his 0, that's what his legacy is all about. His resume is not impressive enough to suffer a loss.
At this time, he probably has ring rust whereas Froch is fighting the best fighters in the world in their PRIME. Nobody would care about a Calslappy tune-up so he'd fight Froch with no tune up fight.
Too much disadvantages for Calzaghe, he won't roll the dice. Prime for Prime Calzaghe wins a UD, but right now Froch is super confident and knows how to overcome the gap skill and make his will prevail. Froch would beat Calzaghe due to his superior will power. Calzaghe is a very satisfied man.Comment
-
This is what people said about Lacy. The fact is that Calzaghe would UD most boxers today. I can't stand him, but its true. I suppose if he has actually slowed down to get caught more than once, he could be KO'd, but I definitely don't see Froch doing it.Comment
-
The slapper would have been bested by many fighters in his weight class long time before Froch ever came around if he was not protected by his promoter and fought lesser competition like he did all his career. Lennox all to his credit was a great fighter and a true champion one of my favorites would have been bested by the man below in the gif I borrowed for ths post....Lefty
Comment
-
Calzaghe is now about 37 years old and retired, Carl Froch should concentrate on active fighters.Comment
-
lmao at bitter yanks still claiming the fallacy that dirrell won..
Dirrel failed on 3 very basic things..
1) he didnt land anything..
2) he didjnt throw any punches...
3) he ran away for 90 percent of the fight...
even if you replaced the judges with the ringside press froch would have won by unanimous decision..
EAven jimmy iowa and dan rafael had froch winning...
grow up...Comment
-
No way are you STILL trying to give reasons for why froch won! dont you get it? Froch is fcukin ****e and nobody gives a fcuk. thats why his fights are live on internet streams and never to be seen live on tv.lmao at bitter yanks still claiming the fallacy that dirrell won..
Dirrel failed on 3 very basic things..
1) he didnt land anything..
2) he didjnt throw any punches...
3) he ran away for 90 percent of the fight...
even if you replaced the judges with the ringside press froch would have won by unanimous decision..
EAven jimmy iowa and dan rafael had froch winning...
grow up...Comment

Comment