featherweight pac versus lightweight floyd

**rao007** · 12-17-2009, 02:55 AM

Pacquiao would lose--he wasn't as technical then as he is today.

**jrosales13** · 12-17-2009, 02:57 AM

Lightweight Floyd wins clearly. Pac was not a complete fighter at featherweight.

**them_apples** · 12-17-2009, 02:58 AM

Originally posted by jrosales13

Lightweight Floyd wins clearly. Pac was not a complete fighter at featherweight.

he was sooo friggen fast though, he'd give Floyd problems, thats for sure.

**DLT** · 12-17-2009, 03:01 AM

Originally posted by them_apples

he was sooo friggen fast though, he'd give Floyd problems, thats for sure.

Are you serious? Are you forgetting how fast Floyd was back then?

**mockingbird** · 12-17-2009, 03:02 AM

Originally posted by rao007

Pacquiao would lose--he wasn't as technical then as he is today.

hes so fast then and ultra relentless. thats what beat floyd, not by being technical

**CrackYourJaw** · 12-17-2009, 03:02 AM

Floyd wins, featherweight Pac was worse technically, one handed and not as strong.

**JAB5239** · 12-17-2009, 03:02 AM

Floyd at 135 threw punches much more than now. Pac at 126 was a more flawed fighter than now. You do the math.

**jrosales13** · 12-17-2009, 03:03 AM

Originally posted by them_apples

he was sooo friggen fast though, he'd give Floyd problems, thats for sure.

lol what about Floyd? Was he slow as a LW? Pac was one dimensional as a Featherweight. There is no way he is beating Floyd. The LW version of Pac would have a better chance then the featherweight version of Pac...

**DLT** · 12-17-2009, 03:03 AM

Originally posted by mockingbird

hes so fast then and ultra relentless. thats what beat floyd, not by being technical

Again, Floyd was super fast back then and he was also way more aggressive. You guys only look at one side. Floyd didnt fight the same way then that he does now

featherweight pac versus lightweight floyd