why is pacquiao not affected by any of his losses?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aether
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 3337
    • 93
    • 59
    • 3,672

    #11
    Originally posted by dibzvincent143
    i think he wouldve won without the headbutt.
    meh... he won 2/3 fights. he came out as the better man. morales is still great.

    Comment

    • RockStar45
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 333
      • 13
      • 0
      • 6,414

      #12
      Because his first two losses occured in the Phillipines when he was still very raw. With Roach, he avenged his loss to Morales and won the trilogy, not to mention he continues to face the top names and continues to win in impressive fashion.

      Losses don't really matter in boxing, it's all about the performance and how a fighter bounces back from a loss. All the all-time greats aside from Maricano have a blemished record.

      Comment

      • championgee
        Banned
        • Dec 2007
        • 190
        • 29
        • 0
        • 267

        #13
        Wrong again

        Pacquias Losses did have an effect on. He has not really been in a fight since where hes been forced to show it. Oscar,Hatton Cotto,Diaz were all averge or shot figters when they fought him. He will be fighting a prime Mayweather. In this fight you will see the true Pacquia. If he is great then you guys have nothing to worry about. If he is not then you will be very sad come march 13th. Mayweather is the cream of the crop. He is boxing!! I , unlike many of you, know and study boxing, over 35 years now, and counting. I have watched Pacmans fights since the beginning including his pro debut on American soil. He has proved to be a tuff blood and guts fighter, no question about that. He has also showed a lack of defense which is more inportant than offense. Any fool can be taught to throw a punch, but only a true boxer can master defense, for you jr's that means Blocking,slipping,rolling, bobbing,weaving. THIS IS WHY PACMAN LOOSSES AND MAWEATHER WINS!!

        Comment

        • aether
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 3337
          • 93
          • 59
          • 3,672

          #14
          Originally posted by championgee
          Pacquias Losses did have an effect on. He has not really been in a fight since where hes been forced to show it. Oscar,Hatton Cotto,Diaz were all averge or shot figters when they fought him. He will be fighting a prime Mayweather. In this fight you will see the true Pacquia. If he is great then you guys have nothing to worry about. If he is not then you will be very sad come march 13th. Mayweather is the cream of the crop. He is boxing!! I , unlike many of you, know and study boxing, over 35 years now, and counting. I have watched Pacmans fights since the beginning including his pro debut on American soil. He has proved to be a tuff blood and guts fighter, no question about that. He has also showed a lack of defense which is more inportant than offense. Any fool can be taught to throw a punch, but only a true boxer can master defense, for you jr's that means Blocking,slipping,rolling, bobbing,weaving. THIS IS WHY PACMAN LOOSSES AND MAWEATHER WINS!!
          for someone who has been watching for 35 years, its weird you can't even spell pacquiao's name right....

          Comment

          • bojangles1987
            bo jungle
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 41118
            • 1,326
            • 357
            • 63,028

            #15
            They did affect him. Pac let his losses have a positive affect on him, he has taken whatever adversity he has faced in his career and learned from it, some fighters don't. Hatton was too far along in his career and too limited as a fighter to learn much from his losses, and we'll see with Cotto, if he takes a break and gets his mind right he can come back just fine.

            Comment

            • cherokee
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 623
              • 12
              • 1
              • 6,763

              #16
              Originally posted by aether
              for someone who has been watching for 35 years, its weird you can't even spell pacquiao's name right....
              that shouldn't come as a surprise. he couldn't even spell his idol's last name right!

              Comment

              • bojangles1987
                bo jungle
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 41118
                • 1,326
                • 357
                • 63,028

                #17
                Originally posted by championgee
                Pacquias Losses did have an effect on. He has not really been in a fight since where hes been forced to show it. Oscar,Hatton Cotto,Diaz were all averge or shot figters when they fought him. He will be fighting a prime Mayweather. In this fight you will see the true Pacquia. If he is great then you guys have nothing to worry about. If he is not then you will be very sad come march 13th. Mayweather is the cream of the crop. He is boxing!! I , unlike many of you, know and study boxing, over 35 years now, and counting. I have watched Pacmans fights since the beginning including his pro debut on American soil. He has proved to be a tuff blood and guts fighter, no question about that. He has also showed a lack of defense which is more inportant than offense. Any fool can be taught to throw a punch, but only a true boxer can master defense, for you jr's that means Blocking,slipping,rolling, bobbing,weaving. THIS IS WHY PACMAN LOOSSES AND MAWEATHER WINS!!
                Dude, really? He has learned from his losses, considering he went on to beat the sh** out of Marco Antonio Barrera after two KO losses and has not lost since Erik Morales beat him after that. What do you mean he hasn't been in a fight where he has had to show anything since his last loss?

                Crap, I just fell for the troll.

                Comment

                • Piper the Great
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 2325
                  • 32
                  • 73
                  • 9,128

                  #18
                  Originally posted by championgee
                  Pacquias Losses did have an effect on. He has not really been in a fight since where hes been forced to show it. Oscar,Hatton Cotto,Diaz were all averge or shot figters when they fought him. He will be fighting a prime Mayweather. In this fight you will see the true Pacquia. If he is great then you guys have nothing to worry about. If he is not then you will be very sad come march 13th. Mayweather is the cream of the crop. He is boxing!! I , unlike many of you, know and study boxing, over 35 years now, and counting. I have watched Pacmans fights since the beginning including his pro debut on American soil. He has proved to be a tuff blood and guts fighter, no question about that. He has also showed a lack of defense which is more inportant than offense. Any fool can be taught to throw a punch, but only a true boxer can master defense, for you jr's that means Blocking,slipping,rolling, bobbing,weaving. THIS IS WHY PACMAN LOOSSES AND MAWEATHER WINS!!
                  trying to defend your leader (who has nothing to do with this thread) you missed the point of the thread.

                  Comment

                  • RL_GMA
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 10271
                    • 507
                    • 103
                    • 26,636

                    #19
                    Originally posted by dibzvincent143
                    like hatton and cotto, whom people said had lost their everything during their first loses.

                    pac was koed twice and badly beaten by Morales too before they fought him.

                    did those loses took anything away from him??
                    No, because most of those losses came early on in his career. Even when he lost to Morales the 1st time, you can see how he adjusted and was much more aggressive the 2nd time around, and since then he hasn't stopped.

                    Some people don't adjust well to losing as where some actually become better after a loss. But of course, Manny is on steroids

                    Comment

                    • S A M U R A I
                      Bulletproof
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 181694
                      • 1,495
                      • 1,324
                      • 1,419,318

                      #20
                      115-113 was the right score. Close fight.



                      100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP