why is pacquiao not affected by any of his losses?

**playaballer1** · 12-14-2009, 10:29 AM

no because he gets better every fight and faced n destroyed bigger fighters

**whoelsebutjames** · 12-14-2009, 10:29 AM

No and it shouldnt.

There are ego boxers who know they are the best and start off at the top and have no where to go but down.

And there are grit fighters who know they can be the best and are able to weather the storm.

The fated and the determined.

**nelsoncm** · 12-14-2009, 10:32 AM

It's incredible how, aside from physical gifts, attitude and mentality separates the great ones from the good ones.

**Don Mac** · 12-14-2009, 10:35 AM

He wasnt badly beaten by Morales. The guy only reached his potential under Roach so any loss pre Roach is not relevant to todays version of Pac.

Pre Diaz, lots of commentators said that Pac was on the slide.. funny that.

**whoelsebutjames** · 12-14-2009, 10:39 AM

Originally posted by nelsoncm

It's incredible how, aside from physical gifts, attitude and mentality separates the great ones from the good ones.

The mind controls the body. and when all else being equal or nearly equal the outcomes is determined ... boxing is like the microcosm of life.. lol

**aether** · 12-14-2009, 10:41 AM

Originally posted by Don Mac

He wasnt badly beaten by Morales. The guy only reached his potential under Roach so any loss pre Roach is not relevant to todays version of Pac.

Pre Diaz, lots of commentators said that Pac was on the slide.. funny that.

yes... it was a competetive fight. would have won fight of the year if it wasn't for castillo-chico.

i don't get how some people say pac got "owned" in that one. if it wasn't competitive, there wouldn't have been a rematch.

**dibzvincent143** · 12-14-2009, 10:42 AM

Pre Diaz, lots of commentators said that Pac was on the slide.. funny that.

yeah..even pre marquez II,coz he wasnt that destructive in barrera II

**dibzvincent143** · 12-14-2009, 10:44 AM

i don't get how some people say pac got "owned" in that one. if it wasn't competitive, there wouldn't have been a rematch.

i think he wouldve won without the headbutt.

**playaballer1** · 12-14-2009, 10:45 AM

Originally posted by aether

yes... it was a competetive fight. would have won fight of the year if it wasn't for castillo-chico.

i don't get how some people say pac got "owned" in that one. if it wasn't competitive, there wouldn't have been a rematch.

Co-sign.. ppl say **** like that to discredit pac.. but it was a close fight.

why is pacquiao not affected by any of his losses?