Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HBO Boxing has PACQUIAO as Fighter of the Decade!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Dondi33O View Post
    Thats what I thought!
    That remains to be seen...

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bigdognyc View Post
      Ummm... Scroll down a bit where it says.." 1BC takes the place of 0"....lol

      Anyway, lets not get confused with all these numbers... Can you count to one??? Is there any number that preceded one??? How about 1/2 or 3/4???

      Ever think of that???
      if 1 bc takes the place of 0 that means 1 is the starting point. meaning 1-10 is the first decade.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by TortillaWarrior View Post

        "Your mother should have swallowed you"
        Your dumb and never proved your point...WTF
        Where does it say Mexicans in Large Numbers pluck eyebrows?..I said they do it too and you have not proven they don't.. So stop owning yourself.
        As for mothers swallowing..No my mom didnt swallow...but your mom did...lol

        Comment


        • [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(number)#In_mathematics"]
          Originally posted by istmeno View Post
          do u realize that you owned yourself with that wiki post. it says clearly that zero is a place holder.

          in case you didnt see it. 0 is both a number and the numerical digit used to represent that number in numerals. It plays a central role in mathematics as the additive identity of the integers, real numbers, and many other algebraic structures. As a digit, 0 is used as a placeholder in place value systems. In the English language, 0 may be called zero, oh, null, nil, or nought, dependant on dialect and context.[1]
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(number)#In_mathematics

          Keep reading!!

          Elementary algebra
          The number 0 is the least non-negative integer. The natural number following 0 is 1 and no natural number precedes 0. The number 0 may or may not be considered a natural number, but it is a whole number and hence a rational number and a real number (as well as an algebraic number and a complex number).
          Either way your stuck on the zero. How long is January 1st of 2000 to Febuary 1st of 2000? That's right, one month. How many months were in the year 2000? That's right, 12, also known as a year!

          Your ignoring every value from 0 to 1. how much value does a dime have? .10(or 1/10) of $1 right!?!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bigdognyc View Post
            That remains to be seen...
            Very remote for us to see that happening.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dondi33O View Post
              Your dumb and never proved your point...WTF
              Where does it say Mexicans in Large Numbers pluck eyebrows?..I said they do it too and you have not proven they don't.. So stop owning yourself.
              As for mothers swallowing..No my mom didnt swallow...but your mom did...lol

              You don't have to say Mexicans in large numbers, you're generally speaking.

              So, no Mexicans don't pluck their eyebrows.


              Thats some ***** ****.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Soir View Post
                Ive actually changed my opinion on this situation.

                While I still think its premature to crown Pac over May, 3 months before we actually know the REAL answer, maybe this will work out for the best afterall.

                Pacquiao is the HBO fighter of the decade . So in 2010 when Mayweather gets accused of ducking Martinez or Paul Williams and dodging the tough challenges, Floyd can always point to, "I beat the fighter of the decade" I know that still wont be enough for the angry haters out there but at least we have this HBO list and a few thousand pac-off threads to prove that Manny was a legit contender prior to March 13th.
                Originally posted by madsweeney View Post
                Your overcomplicating things.

                2000 had 12 months = 1 year
                2001 had 12 months = 1 year
                2002 had 12 months = 1 year
                2003 had 12 months = 1 year
                2004 had 12 months = 1 year
                2005 had 12 months = 1 year
                2006 had 12 months = 1 year
                2007 had 12 months = 1 year
                2008 had 12 months = 1 year
                2009 had 12 months = 1 year
                --------------------------------
                Which adds up to 10 years, a decade

                If you were to add the additional 12 months of 2010 you'd have 11 years! Don't look at the year number, count up how much time actually passed in each year!!
                Originally posted by TortillaWarrior View Post
                Some people are too ****** to even understand basic ****.

                http://www.nba.com/history/season/index.html

                http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/baseballs_bes..._library60.jsp

                http://www.profootballhof.com/hof/years.aspx


                seriously, if that isn't enough proof to what constitutes a decade,

                lets take an example.

                the 1960s.



                1960 year 1
                1961 year 2
                1962 year 3
                1963 year 4
                1964 year 5
                1965 year 6
                1966 year 7
                1967 year 8
                1968 year 9
                1969 year ****ing 10.


                How in the **** do you include the year 1970 as part of the SIXTIES?
                lols.... I know that math is not a strong area for *****s, but it doesn't get anymore simpler than how these guys broke it down.

                damn *****s are ******.

                Comment


                • Do you know what you guys I think sychomanz and istmeno are right. Lets burn all our calendars and rewrite all historical references to decades starting at the "0" years.

                  From now all the decades shall be rewritten.

                  50's - 1951-1960
                  60's - 1961-1970
                  70's - 1971-1980...and so on

                  Wait 0 isnt a real number so we'll just remove those years, afterall they never really happened

                  50's - 1951-1959
                  60's - 1961-1969
                  70's - 1971-1979...and so on

                  Comment


                  • numbers are not their strong points...

                    Comment


                    • That Ray Robinson reference is annoying... He wasn't in his prime when Lamotta beat him.

                      I agree with the rest of the article, though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP