Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather Jr. Plans To Dominate Manny Pacquiao

[tibbar]

Yo arcticfalconer, you sound like you want to suck on Manny's fanny. The guy is beatable and will be beaten on March the 13, 2010, mark my words. You are such a hater on Mayweather that it's a dam shame.
Marquez dominated Manny in two fights. Not one but two. Mayweather can dominate that little short ****** anytime of the day. I will be the first one on this message board looking for you after the fight to say I told you so.

Why didn't he give Marquez a third fight? Because in spite of getting knocked down in both fights Marquez still dominated him; and without the knockdowns Manny would have lost both fights. The same fighter that Mayweather dominated (Marquez), dominated Pacquiao.

yeah, he dominated pacquiao in both fights while lying on his back. he would have won without the knock downs? of course manny won, idiot, how do you think boxing is scored? this f***in' argument is waaaaaaaaayyy ******. blame marquez why he didnt stood his ground, and blame him also why he couldnt/didnt knocked down manny, he can only dominate and not knocked down. blame him also for having the weaker knee. its not the fault of manny to knocked down marquez. and there are boxing judges in every fight with a purpose, and you know what that is, dont you?

[mockingbird]

shot .shot .shot.old.old. shot. handpicked. shot handpicked. shot. ,mayweather justas bad, maybe worse. only fight guys they know thyell beat especially latley.finally the both of them stepping up. a win win for me.

LMAO!

barrera in 2003, them morales, hatton, delahoya. you are right here junior, pac always handpicked the most dangerous fights out there lol

[ncpitbull]

you can ***** about it all day long but the fact remains. pac beat a prime barrera, hatton and cotto, a still very very good morales, a prime sasakul, a prime ledwaba, and a very big and still good delahoya. oh, i almost forgot, he got robbed on his first fight with JMM and the second fight should have been a UD. the ref just gave JMM a little break when JMM held the rope upon getting smacked by a left and did not rule it as KD lols.

So let me get this straight, Pacman beat a "prime" Barrera? Barrera was 63-5, when he fought Pacman. How many fighters are possibly in their prime after 68 fights? He beat a Ricky Hatton that was two fights removed from the Mayweather knock out loss, and and one fight removed from a tough referee aided juan lazcano victory! And Cotto who was 5 months removed from the Clottley war and 2 fights total removed from a knockout loss! And you some how consider these fighters to be in the prime? Why? Even EriK Morales had 52 fights when he met Pacman. And If De lahoya was still good and "VERY BIG", then what was he, when Floyd beat him??? So if it Hatton was in his prime when Pacman beat him at 45-1, what was he when Floyd beat him at 43-0?

[boxingfan76]

LMAO!

barrera in 2003, them morales, hatton, delahoya. you are right here junior, pac always handpicked the most dangerous fights out there lol

obviously ur the junior, delahoya was at his best in the 90s. handpicker. never beat anyone without previous recent losses ,or that isnt old ,or without some kind of massive advantages,since barera.ur not fooling me or anyone *******,we know yor type around here.in fact id be going for pacman against mayweather if not for lunatic fans like yourself.want someone to shut mayweather up but iwant someone to shut up *******s likeyourself a little bit more.

[boxingfan76]

So let me get this straight, Pacman beat a "prime" Barrera? Barrera was 63-5, when he fought Pacman. How many fighters are possibly in their prime after 68 fights? He beat a Ricky Hatton that was two fights removed from the Mayweather knock out loss, and and one fight removed from a tough referee aided juan lazcano victory! And Cotto who was 5 months removed from the Clottley war and 2 fights total removed from a knockout loss! And you some how consider these fighters to be in the prime? Why? Even EriK Morales had 52 fights when he met Pacman. And If De lahoya was still good and "VERY BIG", then what was he, when Floyd beat him??? So if it Hatton was in his prime when Pacman beat him at 45-1, what was he when Floyd beat him at 43-0?

ur dangerous dude.

[boxingfan76]

So let me get this straight, Pacman beat a "prime" Barrera? Barrera was 63-5, when he fought Pacman. How many fighters are possibly in their prime after 68 fights? He beat a Ricky Hatton that was two fights removed from the Mayweather knock out loss, and and one fight removed from a tough referee aided juan lazcano victory! And Cotto who was 5 months removed from the Clottley war and 2 fights total removed from a knockout loss! And you some how consider these fighters to be in the prime? Why? Even EriK Morales had 52 fights when he met Pacman. And If De lahoya was still good and "VERY BIG", then what was he, when Floyd beat him??? So if it Hatton was in his prime when Pacman beat him at 45-1, what was he when Floyd beat him at 43-0?

you put it into words very well , morales lost 2out of 3 to barerra then zahir raheem, these dudes dont get that or choose not to .
pac is dangerous but hes not what they say he is at all.

[tibbar]

Can you mention at least 1/2 of that mistakes you have said. thanks!

probably one is that manny allowed his tryst with krista to be discovered.:blow:

[boxingfan76]

So let me get this straight, Pacman beat a "prime" Barrera? Barrera was 63-5, when he fought Pacman. How many fighters are possibly in their prime after 68 fights? He beat a Ricky Hatton that was two fights removed from the Mayweather knock out loss, and and one fight removed from a tough referee aided juan lazcano victory! And Cotto who was 5 months removed from the Clottley war and 2 fights total removed from a knockout loss! And you some how consider these fighters to be in the prime? Why? Even EriK Morales had 52 fights when he met Pacman. And If De lahoya was still good and "VERY BIG", then what was he, when Floyd beat him??? So if it Hatton was in his prime when Pacman beat him at 45-1, what was he when Floyd beat him at 43-0?

thats why people should watch what they say, emanuel steward said , the pacman is walking amogst the robbinson level", in the cotto fight, I was like GTFOH!!! I wonder if theyll say that about mayweather after he outboxes the **** outta pacyow.

[GRUSTLER]

Manny Pacquiao has improved since moving up in weight but he still
has some of the same flaws we saw in the Marquez fights. The reason
he looked so dominate was because the fighters he has fought of recent
were not on his level speed and conditioning wise. Not taking anything
away from Manny because he handed out 4 beat downs in a row BUT
it is as clear as day and Roach has said it "Floyd Mayweather Jr is a different
fighter than Manny's last 4 opponents" No matter how much you try
to say Pac beat bigger, tougher guys and Mayweather ducked Cotto,
fact of the matter is, Roach has more worry going up against Mayweather
then he does Cotto. Pacquiao had a big speed advantage over his last
opponents but on Floyd, not sure it will be that much or he will at all.
To top it off Floyd is better defensively, counter puncher wise and has
better ring generalship. I give Pac a chance only if Floyd doesn't bring
his A game. I always said and Pac last fights proved me right that Pac
worst nightmare is a patient counter puncher not size and offense. It
took me to pick wrong 3 times to know for sure what I know now and
that is Floyd will beat Manny on March 13th.

[GRUSTLER]

I just have a feeling that Floyd is going to dominate Pac counter punching
wise all night until Roach stops the fight. Pacquiao is open for everything
but it is just his speed is so dominating that fighters get overwhelmed.
Floyd will let Manny fight his fight and then exploit Pac's openings not try
to over power him like Pac's last 4 opponents.