Noticing people saying Wiliiams-Martinez was NOT a robbery

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hammerhiem
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 4877
    • 129
    • 102
    • 11,163

    #21
    Had the douche Judge scored it 115-114 for Williams no one would have grumbled and Williams would have a MD win.

    So not a robbery just an incompetant judge

    Comment

    • Iceta
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 6751
      • 111
      • 205
      • 13,490

      #22
      That one scorecard put a dark shadow on this great fight. You can't deny that.

      Comment

      • Idgas
        vas Normandy
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 3810
        • 111
        • 99
        • 10,583

        #23
        Originally posted by Zarco
        Not a robbery? If Martinez scored a 10-6 round, he would still loose the fight? How is that not a robbery?

        Do you even know what a robbery is? A robbery is when you have already lost before you even get in the ring.
        my definition of a robbery is when a fighter loses when he clearly won. last night's fight was not a very clear fight. i had martinez winning but i could see how other people could have scored it for williams. you're focused on that one judge. if they had a fair judge, this fight wouldn't be so controversial. this is just a case of one judge ruining the whole score.

        Comment

        • Zarco
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2006
          • 4760
          • 184
          • 133
          • 12,032

          #24
          Originally posted by Phoetoe
          my definition of a robbery is when a fighter loses when he clearly won. last night's fight was not a very clear fight. i had martinez winning but i could see how other people could have scored it for williams. you're focused on that one judge. if they had a fair judge, this fight wouldn't be so controversial. this is just a case of one judge ruining the whole score.
          if martinez scored 5 knocked downs, he would have still lost. if thats not a robbery to you then i dont know what is. that judge went into the fight knowing who he was going to pick.
          Last edited by Zarco; 12-06-2009, 04:36 PM.

          Comment

          • JMM_135_#1
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 282
            • 9
            • 12
            • 6,668

            #25
            Originally posted by Zarco
            if martinez scored 5 knocked downs, he would have still lost. if thats not a robbery to you then i dont know what is. that judge went into the fight knowing who he was going to pick.
            no he wouldnt have , i noticed you have ignored my post explaining this, do the math

            the only way it would work how your saying is if paul had gone down 5 times in one round..... after which im pretty sure the fight would have been stopped

            Comment

            • Idgas
              vas Normandy
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 3810
              • 111
              • 99
              • 10,583

              #26
              Originally posted by Zarco
              if martinez scored 5 knocked downs, he would have still lost. if thats not a robbery to you then i dont know what is. that judge went into the fight knowing who he was going to pick.
              yea i got that. you said that already. problem here is that you are so sure that martinez won while others have it a close fight that could have gone either way. no surprise you're screaming robbery.

              Comment

              • Zarco
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2006
                • 4760
                • 184
                • 133
                • 12,032

                #27
                Originally posted by Phoetoe
                yea i got that. you said that already. problem here is that you are so sure that martinez won while others have it a close fight that could have gone either way. no surprise you're screaming robbery.
                the point here is not to talk about how i have it scored or how every other fan has it scored. the point is to talk about a judge who was hired to rob no matter what. the other judges would have leveled it out but the point is that there was a man that martinez was against sitting on the judges seat.
                Originally posted by JMM_135_#1
                no he wouldnt have , i noticed you have ignored my post explaining this, do the math

                the only way it would work how your saying is if paul had gone down 5 times in one round..... after which im pretty sure the fight would have been stopped
                how did that benoist judge score the first round? do you know?

                Comment

                • JMM_135_#1
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 282
                  • 9
                  • 12
                  • 6,668

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Zarco
                  the point here is not to talk about how i have it scored or how every other fan has it scored. the point is to talk about a judge who was hired to rob no matter what. the other judges would have leveled it out but the point is that there was a man that martinez was against sitting on the judges seat.

                  how did that benoist judge score the first round? do you know?
                  no i have a sneaking suspiscion it was for williams

                  Comment

                  • Idgas
                    vas Normandy
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 3810
                    • 111
                    • 99
                    • 10,583

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Zarco
                    the point here is not to talk about how i have it scored or how every other fan has it scored. the point is to talk about a judge who was hired to rob no matter what. the other judges would have leveled it out but the point is that there was a man that martinez was against sitting on the judges seat.
                    benoist is a bull**** judge, no one's arguing that.

                    Comment

                    • Zarco
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 4760
                      • 184
                      • 133
                      • 12,032

                      #30
                      Originally posted by JMM_135_#1
                      no i have a sneaking suspiscion it was for williams
                      Ok just got it off another thread.

                      so here is benoist's official score card:

                      Martinez: 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 = 110
                      Williams: 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 = 119

                      your right i was exaggerating about the 4 KD's.

                      but say he scored 2 more knockdowns after the first 2 rounds?

                      Martinez: 10 10 9 9 9 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 = 112
                      Williams: 10 9 10 10 10 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 = 115

                      thats still a major robbery not to give it to martinez. that judge being there made the fight a robbery.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP