Noticing people saying Wiliiams-Martinez was NOT a robbery

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zarco
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 4760
    • 184
    • 133
    • 12,032

    #1

    Noticing people saying Wiliiams-Martinez was NOT a robbery

    Martinez could have scored a total of 4 KNOCK DOWNS, add them to Pierre Benoist's card of 110-119 and Martinez still loses the fight.

    That my friends, is a ROBBERY.
  • JMM_135_#1
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 282
    • 9
    • 12
    • 6,668

    #2
    Originally posted by Zarco
    Martinez could have scored a total of 4 KNOCK DOWNS, add them to Pierre Benoist's card of 110-119 and Martinez still loses the fight.

    That my friends, is a ROBBERY.
    depends if they were in rounds that martinez won or williams did.... in reality

    Comment

    • DiegoFuego
      Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2005
      • 17338
      • 1,403
      • 586
      • 24,657

      #3
      what do you mean with the knockdowns comment? he got one knockdown in round 1. Williams was never close to going down after that

      Comment

      • Zarco
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 4760
        • 184
        • 133
        • 12,032

        #4
        Originally posted by DiegoFuego
        what do you mean with the knockdowns comment? he got one knockdown in round 1. Williams was never close to going down after that
        Originally posted by Zarco
        Martinez could have scored a total of 4 KNOCK DOWNS, add them to Pierre Benoist's card of 110-119 and Martinez still loses the fight.

        That my friends, is a ROBBERY.
        .....................

        Comment

        • paulf
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 23753
          • 3,340
          • 2,100
          • 1,052,140

          #5
          One scorecard was bad. Two of them were good. It happens.

          I had Sergio winning, but that's the way the cookie crumbles. In a very close fight, someone has to win, and someone has to loose. Judging pro boxing isnt as clear as the amateures.

          The judge with the bad scorecard should be reited though.

          Comment

          • tito yuca
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2006
            • 1843
            • 237
            • 233
            • 8,377

            #6
            Originally posted by DiegoFuego
            what do you mean with the knockdowns comment? he got one knockdown in round 1. Williams was never close to going down after that
            That even if Martinez HAD knocked Williams down 4 times, he still would've lost on the old dude's card.

            Comment

            • Dorian
              The P4P King
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2005
              • 26501
              • 1,652
              • 2,198
              • 42,879

              #7
              I agree with Williams 115-113 or 114-114.

              It was a close fight, could have gone either way. I know the 119-110 scorecard was out of this world but what can you do?

              Comment

              • Two Clips
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2007
                • 2953
                • 159
                • 180
                • 10,849

                #8
                No sir it was not a robbery because the fight could have went either way, there was really no clear winner in that fight. The judge that scored the fight 119-110 was clearly watching another fight and should be held responsible for such a lopsided bull**** scorecard.

                Comment

                • JMM_135_#1
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 282
                  • 9
                  • 12
                  • 6,668

                  #9
                  Originally posted by tito yuca
                  That even if Martinez HAD knocked Williams down 4 times, he still would've lost on the old dude's card.

                  incorrect that judge had paul 11-1 up, so the 4 knock downs would be scored in rounds that williams won on his score card

                  with 4 knock downs it ends up

                  114 - 111 martinez

                  Comment

                  • Zarco
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 4760
                    • 184
                    • 133
                    • 12,032

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Two Clips
                    No sir it was not a robbery because the fight could have went either way, there was really no clear winner in that fight. The judge that scored the fight 119-110 was clearly watching another fight and should be held responsible for such a lopsided bull**** scorecard.
                    damn....you just dont get it...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP