Re : Willaims vs. Martinez- MOST OF YOU ARE IDIOTS.
Collapse
-
-
doesn't matter 119-110 = robbery. this fight is tainted and pwill shouldn't get credit for it.I mean I see what you are saying and to me it's horrid that it seems like Martinez didn't have a chance here.
But, again the announcers talked about this at the end. Most people are not educated as to what judges are looking for. So they may have been scoring ONLY for aggression (effective or not) which seems to be a TREND nowadays (for the last 5 years at least).
Ever think of that?
rematch is necessary for both.Comment
-
Comment
-
I'm not sure what you mean. I am calling out Tunney, not you.Comment
-
Paul is the one who needs to redeem himself, he did not live up to his hype.
Pauls management will wait for this fight to fade in peoples memories and will then go for the bigger fights. Martinez is not Quintana as we all saw he can hurt Williams.Comment
-
Comment
-
Completely agree, especially your rational for the fact that Martinez won.To me, if a judge could be paid off or bribed, and I'm lead to believe this was the case, it's a robbery. They are taking away a mans chance at a fair fight. Taking, is robbing.
I had it close, 114-113, for Martinez.
To me, Martinez was more accurate, hand landed the better shots, hurt his guy more and was just overall; better.Comment
Comment