Tyson the heir apparent - the heavyweight division's only UNDEFEATED contender

**Slipx** · 04-16-2005, 12:42 PM

still being an annoying little **** i see

**joeboxer** · 04-16-2005, 01:43 PM

hahhahahahahahahahah

that pretty much covers it. So do you think Tyson deserves a shot a the title in his next fight or do you think that he should take his time Anorak?

**!! Mr. Soprano** · 04-16-2005, 02:02 PM

Originally posted by Anorak

I'm tired of all this Tyson dissing on here.

Here is an indestructible champ who will one day reunify the division. His record is unblemished, with zero defeats. Consider the following:

Buster Douglas - Douglas was knocked down and didn't get up before the ten count. Tyson wasn't focussed, and had bad cornermen. If that fight was in the US, Tyson would never have lost. FACT.

Evander Holyfield - Holyfield only beat Tyson by fouling and using headbutts. FACT.

Lennox Lewis - Tyson had so many tranquilisers that even an elephant wouldn't have been able to stand. Besides, losing to Lewis was his way at showing disapproval that his payment would go towards alimony. FACT.

Danny Williams - Tyson damaged his knee. If this hadn't happened Tyson would have KOed Danny Williams in the first round. FACT.

Tyson is now set to reclaim his glory by fighting top contender Kevin McBride, a man who is ranked in the top 160 heavyweights. So kiss my ass, Tyson haters!!

I don't think there are "Tyson haters" among us. The man is a legend and deserves his respect.

HOWEVER, what many of us DO BELIEVE is that his days as the #1 HW are over.. He is way passed his prime and will never be 'THE IRON MIKE TYSON' again.

Sure he can still knock top HW left and right in the first few rounds, but not the same..

**Martin (Top Knowledge)** · 04-16-2005, 05:01 PM

Anorak... I know you're taking the piss BUT!...

You gotta learn the difference between FACT! and OPINION!... LOL!..

**jack_the_rippuh** · 04-16-2005, 05:13 PM

Anorak, I agree with that list to be honest with you.
Tyson, in my opinion, only has 1 loss what came fair and square and that was his loss to Lennox Lewis, but even him being past his prime and Lewis being at his best in his prime can be brought up as an argument. Everything thing else you said was true. You were probably being sarcastic, but I'm dead serious..

**ottoevans** · 04-16-2005, 05:35 PM

the man lost all those fights ya mentioned.

Douglass- the man wasnt focused, whos fault is that?? If they would have faught again Tyson would have killed him, but its happens.

Holyfield - Just flat out beat his ass.

Lewis - that was just murder

Williams - he lost cause of his knee, thats not Williams fault, **** happens.

Douglass and Williams fight was fluke cause he got injured and he underetimated the other.

Lewis and Evander - he just faced guys who were better than him

**Guest** · 04-16-2005, 07:19 PM

Originally posted by ottoevans

the man lost all those fights ya mentioned.

Douglass- the man wasnt focused, whos fault is that?? If they would have faught again Tyson would have killed him, but its happens.

Holyfield - Just flat out beat his ass.

Lewis - that was just murder

Williams - he lost cause of his knee, thats not Williams fault, **** happens.

Douglass and Williams fight was fluke cause he got injured and he underetimated the other.

Lewis and Evander - he just faced guys who were better than him

Well **** me, I feel as if the scales have been lifted from my eyes!!!

**Guest** · 04-16-2005, 07:20 PM

Originally posted by joeboxer

hahhahahahahahahahah

that pretty much covers it. So do you think Tyson deserves a shot a the title in his next fight or do you think that he should take his time Anorak?

Tyson would DESTROY Vitali. Look at the facts: Tyson chose to lose to Williams in 4. Williams got beat by Vitali in 8. So Tyson would beat Vitali.

It's a FACT.

**ottoevans** · 04-16-2005, 07:26 PM

what the hell

Tyson the heir apparent - the heavyweight division's only UNDEFEATED contender