Pacqiuao vs Mayweather: a serious compubox analysis
Collapse
-
-
-
Look why don't you do the same analysis with Hatton and Mayweather? The results will show you why we don't predict fights with stats.that is already considered in the equation. I multiply pac's average punches thrown with floyd's opponent's connect percentage and averaged that w/ pac's average punches landed.
please get it in your heads that floyd's opponent's connect percentage already quantifies floyd's defense.Comment
-
Comment
-
No you have not, you have claimed to but you refuse to accept the flaws with your analysis. Your stats and analysis are meaningless at best~
Numbers don't lie, but people using them to explain or predict certainly can.Comment
-
I'm gonna be rich, RICH I tell ya.
Nah, but seriously it wasn't too bad as far as formulas go. The thing is, if you watched the first 4 rounds of Floyd/Zab, you'd never guess Floyd would win the next 8. He's very good at thinking on his feet and adapting to whatever his opponent is doing. The only time he's not done that was in the first Castillo fight, when he was injured, and he came back in the rematch and handled business.
One thing I can say though, is you can't multiply a guy's average punches thrown and use it in a formula, when the guy is going to fight a counter puncher like Floyd, who will be dropping that number. Look at what happened to Calzaghe's numbers against Hopkins, or Williams' numbers against Quintana. When you're getting consistently countered, you throw less, period.Comment
-
Also your sample size in very small, with such a small sample size really hard to gather any real meaning.Comment
-
Stats for Hatton : http://www.compuboxonline.com/notes/hatton.shtml
Stats for Mayweather : http://www.hbo.com/boxing/events/200...pubox_pre.html (you already have stats for the baldomir and oscar fights)
I'll be waiting for the results.Comment
-
I have addressed all your criticisms, my analysis still stands.
I don't know how I'm lying about the numbers, I takes some numbers, run them through a formula and more numbers come out.
if you think i didn't use the same formula for floyd and pac, then do the numbers yourself.
I don't doubt that floyd can adapt, but seeing as zab was included in the sample pool, that has been incorporated in the calculation.I'm gonna be rich, RICH I tell ya.
Nah, but seriously it wasn't too bad as far as formulas go. The thing is, if you watched the first 4 rounds of Floyd/Zab, you'd never guess Floyd would win the next 8. He's very good at thinking on his feet and adapting to whatever his opponent is doing. The only time he's not done that was in the first Castillo fight, when he was injured, and he came back in the rematch and handled business.
Like I've already said, floyd's defense (floyd's opponent's connect percentage)has already been incorporated in the formula.One thing I can say though, is you can't multiply a guy's average punches thrown and use it in a formula, when the guy is going to fight a counter puncher like Floyd, who will be dropping that number. Look at what happened to Calzaghe's numbers against Hopkins, or Williams' numbers against Quintana. When you're getting consistently countered, you throw less, period.
agreed, but if you go too far back w/ the sample size then you skew the results because both fighters don't fight the same as they did 5 years ago.
aw man, that's way too much work... I need the stats compiled in a form like in the 2 links I provided in the first postStats for Hatton : http://www.compuboxonline.com/notes/hatton.shtml
Stats for Mayweather : http://www.hbo.com/boxing/events/200...pubox_pre.html (you already have stats for the baldomir and oscar fights)
I'll be waiting for the results.Comment
-
Comment
Comment