Pacqiuao vs Mayweather: a serious compubox analysis
Collapse
-
-
I have addressed all your criticisms, my analysis still stands.
I don't know how I'm lying about the numbers, I takes some numbers, run them through a formula and more numbers come out.
if you think i didn't use the same formula for floyd and pac, then do the numbers yourself.
agreed, but if you go too far back w/ the sample size then you skew the results because both fighters don't fight the same as they did 5 years ago.
If you believe in what you are saying I have a bridge to sell you~.
The larger the sample the better the statistics. They are different fighters that is the main reason it is flawed from the jump Manny's last three opponents fight nothing like Floyd so using them as a basis for comparison is why the whole analysis is flawed.Comment
-
If you believe in what you are saying I have a bridge to sell you~.
The larger the sample the better the statistics. They are different fighters that is the main reason it is flawed from the jump Manny's last three opponents fight nothing like Floyd so using them as a basis for comparison is why the whole analysis is flawed.
2) I already acknowledge that pac and floyd have unique styles in the limitations section of the first post, but this applies to both floyd and pac, LIKE I'VE ALREADY SAID: ITS A WASH, NEITHER FLOYD NOR PAC GETS AN ADVANTAGE BASED ON THE UNIQUENESS OF THEIR STYLES, that is to say, the fact that their styles are unique cancels each other out. I could put the variables X (floyd's uniqueness) and Y (pac's uniqueness) into the equation but X cancels out Y and vice versa anyways.Comment
-
I've already addressed them all, go back and look at the thread.
1) a larger sample may not yield better statistics in this instance because floyd and pac don't fight the same as they did 5 years ago.
2) I already acknowledge that pac and floyd have unique styles in the limitations section of the first post, but this applies to both floyd and pac, LIKE I'VE ALREADY SAID: ITS A WASH, NEITHER FLOYD NOR PAC GETS AN ADVANTAGE BASED ON THE UNIQUENESS OF THEIR STYLES, that is to say, the fact that their styles are unique cancels each other out. I could put the variables X (floyd's uniqueness) and Y (pac's uniqueness) into the equation but X cancels out Y and vice versa anyways.
You can do nothing with this flaw, so you wasted your time.Comment
-
No you have not addressed them because the situation is not a wash, that is you judging that it is a wash so your analysis is flawed by that judgement. You do not know how that will intereact, which is why I called your stas meaningless and your analysis flawed.
You can do nothing with this flaw, so you wasted your time.
but based on the numbers pac will outwork floyd.Comment
-
You are making an assumption about their styles though saying it is a wash, that is a flaw in your whole analysis.Comment
-
compubox stats taken from
- http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/9/16...iance-of-floyd
- http://compuboxonline.com/special_co...man_last_3.pdf
The Stats:
In Floyd's last 5 fights he's thrown an average of 37 punches per round and landed an average of 15.9 punches per round; at a 42.9 connect percentage.
Floyd's opponents landed at connect percentage of 16.4%.
In Pac's last 4 fights he's thrown an average of 67 punches a round and landed an average of 28.8 punches per round; at a 42.4% connect percentage.
Pac's opponents landed at a connect percentage of 25.3%.
The Math
So here's the math... to figure out how many average punches per round fighter A would land on fighter B we simply multiply the average number of punches thrown per round of fighter A by the connect percentage of fighter B's opponents and average that with fighter A's average punches landed per round.
Here's the number crunch folks:
In a heads up match up, Floyd would land [(37 x 25.3%) + 15.9]/2 = 12.63 punches per round on Pac, and Pac would land [(67 x 16.4% ) + 28.8]/2 = 19.89 punches per round on Floyd.
Conclusion of the Analysis:
Even though Floyd is more accurate by .5% and his defense is better by 8.9%, Pac's high workrate overcomes the deficit and Pac manages to outland floyd by 7.26 punches per round.
Limits of the Analysis:
- I just looked at the total number of punches and was too lazy to calculate the jabs and power punches separately.
- This analysis does not take into consideration subjective judging criteria.
- To be sure, Floyd's last 5 opponents do not fight like Pac and neither does Pac's last 4 opponents fight like Floyd.
Prediction:
Considering Pac will outland and outpunch Floyd based on this analysis, and that Pac punches harder than Floyd, and the limitations of this analysis, I predict that Pac will win a SD or close UD, with the possibility of Pac knocking down Floyd at least once.
Take Hatton; despite the smothering and clinching, the guy was able to land 52 power punches on Floyd, and we all saw the hand-speed difference between Hatton and Pacquiao when they fought.
Take Judah. When Judah was being offensive minded (1-5 rounds) he landed 50 punches in 5 rounds, a big percentage of which are power shots (mostly straight lefts, Pacquiao's money shot). Thing is, Judah's output diminished in the later rounds. Pacquiao's handspeed's comparable to Judah's but Pacquiao's punch output doesn't go down. So at Judah-level speed and punch output, Pacquiao stands to land AT LEAST 80 powershots on Mayweather.
Compare Marquez' post-fight face with 183 power shots from Mayweather, with his post-fight faces against Pacquiao who only landed 100 and 114 power shots on him (when Pacquiao only had a predictable left straight)
I don't think Mayweather has the power will deter Pacman's assault. Pacman has the footspeed, handspeed, and style to land a considerable amount of powershots on Mayweather and Pacquiao has the power to boot, to keep Mayweather defensive minded, thus keeping Mayweather's power punch output at a minimum.Comment
-
This is why I think half the members here have never been inside of the ring before or a fight for that matter.
When you can't get in range, when your opponent is counter punching you or when you miss punches your punch output will diminish. Punching and missing consumes energy, getting counter punched makes you more hesitant and when you're not in range you can't throw flurries.Comment
Comment