Pacqiuao vs Mayweather: a serious compubox analysis

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • balistik94
    Amateur
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 29
    • 0
    • 0
    • 6,097

    #231
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    aw man, that's way too much work... I need the stats compiled in a form like in the 2 links I provided in the first post
    Aight I'll give you the compiled stats later.

    Comment

    • The Gambler1981
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 25961
      • 520
      • 774
      • 49,039

      #232
      Originally posted by Pullcounter
      I have addressed all your criticisms, my analysis still stands.

      I don't know how I'm lying about the numbers, I takes some numbers, run them through a formula and more numbers come out.

      if you think i didn't use the same formula for floyd and pac, then do the numbers yourself.



      agreed, but if you go too far back w/ the sample size then you skew the results because both fighters don't fight the same as they did 5 years ago.

      No you have not addressed a single one, and that is why they are meaningless stats and the whole analysis is flawed.

      If you believe in what you are saying I have a bridge to sell you~.

      The larger the sample the better the statistics. They are different fighters that is the main reason it is flawed from the jump Manny's last three opponents fight nothing like Floyd so using them as a basis for comparison is why the whole analysis is flawed.

      Comment

      • Pullcounter
        no guts no glory
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 42582
        • 549
        • 191
        • 49,739

        #233
        Originally posted by The Gambler1981
        No you have not addressed a single one, and that is why they are meaningless stats and the whole analysis is flawed.
        I've already addressed them all, go back and look at the thread.

        If you believe in what you are saying I have a bridge to sell you~.

        The larger the sample the better the statistics. They are different fighters that is the main reason it is flawed from the jump Manny's last three opponents fight nothing like Floyd so using them as a basis for comparison is why the whole analysis is flawed.
        1) a larger sample may not yield better statistics in this instance because floyd and pac don't fight the same as they did 5 years ago.

        2) I already acknowledge that pac and floyd have unique styles in the limitations section of the first post, but this applies to both floyd and pac, LIKE I'VE ALREADY SAID: ITS A WASH, NEITHER FLOYD NOR PAC GETS AN ADVANTAGE BASED ON THE UNIQUENESS OF THEIR STYLES, that is to say, the fact that their styles are unique cancels each other out. I could put the variables X (floyd's uniqueness) and Y (pac's uniqueness) into the equation but X cancels out Y and vice versa anyways.

        Comment

        • The Gambler1981
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 25961
          • 520
          • 774
          • 49,039

          #234
          Originally posted by Pullcounter
          I've already addressed them all, go back and look at the thread.



          1) a larger sample may not yield better statistics in this instance because floyd and pac don't fight the same as they did 5 years ago.

          2) I already acknowledge that pac and floyd have unique styles in the limitations section of the first post, but this applies to both floyd and pac, LIKE I'VE ALREADY SAID: ITS A WASH, NEITHER FLOYD NOR PAC GETS AN ADVANTAGE BASED ON THE UNIQUENESS OF THEIR STYLES, that is to say, the fact that their styles are unique cancels each other out. I could put the variables X (floyd's uniqueness) and Y (pac's uniqueness) into the equation but X cancels out Y and vice versa anyways.
          No you have not addressed them because the situation is not a wash, that is you judging that it is a wash so your analysis is flawed by that judgement. You do not know how that will intereact, which is why I called your stas meaningless and your analysis flawed.

          You can do nothing with this flaw, so you wasted your time.

          Comment

          • bt16
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 132
            • 8
            • 5
            • 6,271

            #235
            if you're seriously arguing over one person's personal analysis, you're a ****in baby. its basically his own analysis, and if you're gonna argue with him like he's nostradamus then you can have a bottle.

            Comment

            • Pullcounter
              no guts no glory
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 42582
              • 549
              • 191
              • 49,739

              #236
              Originally posted by The Gambler1981
              No you have not addressed them because the situation is not a wash, that is you judging that it is a wash so your analysis is flawed by that judgement. You do not know how that will intereact, which is why I called your stas meaningless and your analysis flawed.

              You can do nothing with this flaw, so you wasted your time.
              that is beyond the scope of this compubox analysis... nobody knows how their styles will interact, not even you, therefore its a wash.

              but based on the numbers pac will outwork floyd.

              Comment

              • The_Demon
                Big dog
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 13603
                • 1,354
                • 888
                • 22,971

                #237
                using compubox too determine the outcome of a fight
                i cant stop laughing at how ******ed that is

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #238
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  that is beyond the scope of this compubox analysis... nobody knows how their styles will interact, not even you, therefore its a wash.

                  but based on the numbers pac will outwork floyd.
                  You are making an assumption about their styles though saying it is a wash, that is a flaw in your whole analysis.

                  Comment

                  • badboypeenoy
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 3203
                    • 54
                    • 44
                    • 9,669

                    #239
                    Originally posted by Pullcounter
                    compubox stats taken from
                    - http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/9/16...iance-of-floyd
                    - http://compuboxonline.com/special_co...man_last_3.pdf

                    The Stats:


                    In Floyd's last 5 fights he's thrown an average of 37 punches per round and landed an average of 15.9 punches per round; at a 42.9 connect percentage.

                    Floyd's opponents landed at connect percentage of 16.4%.

                    In Pac's last 4 fights he's thrown an average of 67 punches a round and landed an average of 28.8 punches per round; at a 42.4% connect percentage.

                    Pac's opponents landed at a connect percentage of 25.3%.

                    The Math

                    So here's the math... to figure out how many average punches per round fighter A would land on fighter B we simply multiply the average number of punches thrown per round of fighter A by the connect percentage of fighter B's opponents and average that with fighter A's average punches landed per round.

                    Here's the number crunch folks:
                    In a heads up match up, Floyd would land [(37 x 25.3%) + 15.9]/2 = 12.63 punches per round on Pac, and Pac would land [(67 x 16.4% ) + 28.8]/2 = 19.89 punches per round on Floyd.

                    Conclusion of the Analysis:

                    Even though Floyd is more accurate by .5% and his defense is better by 8.9%, Pac's high workrate overcomes the deficit and Pac manages to outland floyd by 7.26 punches per round.

                    Limits of the Analysis:

                    - I just looked at the total number of punches and was too lazy to calculate the jabs and power punches separately.
                    - This analysis does not take into consideration subjective judging criteria.
                    - To be sure, Floyd's last 5 opponents do not fight like Pac and neither does Pac's last 4 opponents fight like Floyd.

                    Prediction:

                    Considering Pac will outland and outpunch Floyd based on this analysis, and that Pac punches harder than Floyd, and the limitations of this analysis, I predict that Pac will win a SD or close UD, with the possibility of Pac knocking down Floyd at least once.
                    Try getting the connect percentage of Mayweather's SLOWEST opponent say...Baldomir, that guy connected 67 power punches in 12 rounds against Mayweather.

                    Take Hatton; despite the smothering and clinching, the guy was able to land 52 power punches on Floyd, and we all saw the hand-speed difference between Hatton and Pacquiao when they fought.

                    Take Judah. When Judah was being offensive minded (1-5 rounds) he landed 50 punches in 5 rounds, a big percentage of which are power shots (mostly straight lefts, Pacquiao's money shot). Thing is, Judah's output diminished in the later rounds. Pacquiao's handspeed's comparable to Judah's but Pacquiao's punch output doesn't go down. So at Judah-level speed and punch output, Pacquiao stands to land AT LEAST 80 powershots on Mayweather.

                    Compare Marquez' post-fight face with 183 power shots from Mayweather, with his post-fight faces against Pacquiao who only landed 100 and 114 power shots on him (when Pacquiao only had a predictable left straight)

                    I don't think Mayweather has the power will deter Pacman's assault. Pacman has the footspeed, handspeed, and style to land a considerable amount of powershots on Mayweather and Pacquiao has the power to boot, to keep Mayweather defensive minded, thus keeping Mayweather's power punch output at a minimum.

                    Comment

                    • go1nbanana
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 704
                      • 15
                      • 205
                      • 7,385

                      #240
                      Originally posted by FeFist
                      This is why I think half the members here have never been inside of the ring before or a fight for that matter.

                      When you can't get in range, when your opponent is counter punching you or when you miss punches your punch output will diminish. Punching and missing consumes energy, getting counter punched makes you more hesitant and when you're not in range you can't throw flurries.
                      i can see this fight similar to round 1-3 of floyd-judah fight. pac will be countering floyd's jabs with right hooks and he will be landing straight lefts to floyd's face. floyds face will be swollen. pac is better than judah, he will not let floyd take a breather and will not gas out after 4 rounds

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP