No its not, it was created to give smaller guys some credit but does not exclude HWs.....when you ask who is the p4p #1 you are asking; if all of the best fighters in every weight class could be scaled down to the same size while retaining the attributes which made them successful who would be the best in this imaginary tourney...that is all, its not exclusive or about wins in any way.
That's one way of looking at it. The whole point about calling Rob P4P was to describe that he was a better fighter though one would expect him not to beat the best heavies. The best Heavyweight in the world SHOULD be the king of boxing.
That's one way of looking at it. The whole point about calling Rob P4P was to describe that he was a better fighter though one would expect him not to beat the best heavies. The best Heavyweight in the world SHOULD be the king of boxing.
He was at one time, I don't know when really but there was a just a boxing champion who would usually be bigger and weightclasses were created out of fairness later on.
Your not qualified to make a P4P list if you never had the heart to get in there, or loss and understand way. Boxing is a test of will, after you run out of skill.
And any list that includes a fighter that has not been in a ring, Hopkins or Mosley, in their top 5, is a fan.
Tweet
Comment