Does he deserve Pac, do you still want the fight made.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAB5239
    Dallas Cowboys
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 28414
    • 5,418
    • 4,540
    • 73,018

    #131
    Originally posted by Brandish
    who are these boxing experts you speak of are they journalists for a magazine called ring.

    once again hatton fought no one of merit at 140 after zoo:

    1. maussa
    2. urango
    3. castillo
    4. lazcano
    5. malinagi

    as compared to facing:

    1. bradley
    2. holt
    3. alexander
    4. torres
    5. witter

    pac hasn't faced anyone of note at 140 and if you think beating hatton and cotto makes pac untouchable and greater than floyd you need to pull your head out of your ass because floyd is going to crush him and then I want to see what you have to say about floys being worthy.

    **** if david diaz, ricky haton, and oscar de la hoya are worthy to face pac why wouldn't floyd.//but don't answer I already know what you are going to say
    And who did Floyd face that was the "consensus" number 1?

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 739
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #132
      Originally posted by Bhopreign
      Who was the top rated fighter at 154 when Floyd fought Oscar, youve been wrong numerous times tonight.
      Roman Karmazin was ranked higher, Kassim Ouma was ranked higher. Cory Spinks was ranked higher adnd I am not sure if it was Forrest or Dzinziruk who had the the #4 spot. Or maybe it was Oscar. But, I know Oscar was not the top guy. Karmazin was and Spinks was rated #2. And, Karmazin got the #1 spot by beating Ouma who dropped to #3. History lesson bro

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #133
        Originally posted by jrosales13
        Roman Karmazin was ranked higher, Kassim Ouma was ranked higher. Cory Spinks was ranked higher adnd I am not sure if it was Forrest or Dzinziruk who had the the #4 spot. Or maybe it was Oscar. But, I know Oscar was not the top guy. Karmazin was and Spinks was rated #2. And, Karmazin got the #1 spot by beating Ouma who dropped to #3. History lesson bro
        Ive seen other ratings that said otherwise, but again you said Diaz/Pac did the same numbers as Baldy/Floyd, care to give me a history lesson on that also and by the way Karmazin was not the top guy at 154 when Floyd fought Oscar, try again.

        Comment

        • JAB5239
          Dallas Cowboys
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 28414
          • 5,418
          • 4,540
          • 73,018

          #134
          Originally posted by Bhopreign
          How could you care less about someone's personality, you dont really know them. I go on boxing ability to determine who I like to watch fight, we dont really know these people and I could care less about their personality. Im a fan of Pac and Floyd because I like the way they fight nothing else.

          when both are the best and only one keeps stepping up.......thats how I determine my personal preference. Substance over hype.

          Comment

          • JAB5239
            Dallas Cowboys
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 28414
            • 5,418
            • 4,540
            • 73,018

            #135
            Originally posted by Brandish
            answer the question has pac fought the best from 135-147
            He's fought better in 2 out of 3 weight classes. Care to argue that?

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #136
              Originally posted by JAB5239

              when both are the best and only one keeps stepping up.......thats how I determine my personal preference. Substance over hype.
              But you said personality, which is it.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #137
                Originally posted by Bhopreign
                Pac - Floyd is more legacy, how can you think otherwise. Id rather see Mosley/Pac, but Floyd/Pac is more of a legacy fight for Pac.
                A win over Floyd just cements Pac being the best fighter of this era. Maybe the greatest fighter in the las 30yrs.

                But, a win over Shane. Pac would win the lineal WW title. Think about that he would have 3 lineal titles in 3 of the original 8 weightclasses. Name me all the fighters who have won 3 lineal titles in in the original 8 weightclasses. And, if you know all of them look where they rank all time. Name me who won a lineal title in Featherweight and in Welterweight? And, look where they rank all time.

                Naw bro a win over Shane for a lineal WW title does more for Pac legacy.

                Comment

                • JAB5239
                  Dallas Cowboys
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 28414
                  • 5,418
                  • 4,540
                  • 73,018

                  #138
                  Originally posted by Bhopreign
                  But you said personality, which is it.

                  Bull. I've always said substance and accomplishment are more important. My dislike of a fighters personality never gets in the way of determing his skills, talent or ability. I dare you to show otherwise, or just quit flaqt out lying and trying to twist thing. Floyd fans, not stans, already know this about me.

                  Comment

                  • Bhopreign
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 11273
                    • 419
                    • 100
                    • 12,036

                    #139
                    Originally posted by jrosales13
                    A win over Floyd just cements Pac being the best fighter of this era. Maybe the greatest fighter in the las 30yrs.

                    But, a win over Shane. Pac would win the lineal WW title. Think about that he would have 3 lineal titles in 3 of the original 8 weightclasses. Name me all the fighters who have won 3 lineal titles in in the original 8 weightclasses. And, if you know all of them look where they rank all time. Name me who won a lineal title in Featherweight and in Welterweight? And, look where they rank all time.

                    Naw bro a win over Shane for a lineal WW title does more for Pac legacy.
                    Again beating Mosley would not make him lineal.

                    Comment

                    • JAB5239
                      Dallas Cowboys
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 28414
                      • 5,418
                      • 4,540
                      • 73,018

                      #140
                      Originally posted by Bhopreign
                      Again beating Mosley would not make him lineal.

                      would it not make him more legit at 147?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP