Originally posted by rskumm21
View Post
But he's forgetting that:
1) in Compubox stats, a power punch doesn't mean a powerful punch, it means any punch that isn't a jab, however weak or ineffective it may be (and even including slaps); but ineffective punches are not scored by the judges, and powerful punches are given a lot more weight in the judging than weak ones;
2) in Compubox stats, glancing blows that don't land cleanly are still counted, but in judging, it's only clean and effective punches that count;
3) clean and effective punches are only one out of four criteria that rounds are judged on, they are not the sole criteria, and the other three criteria also matter;
4) Compubox stats are every bit as subject to human error as judges' scores are. Compubox stats are not objective, they are just some guy watching live who presses a button whenever he thinks he sees a punch land - without the benefit of slow motion replays. If you had three people pressing a button, you'd get just as much variety in the stats as you currently get in the judges scoring. It's just a reflection of how one guy happened to see the fight, and nothing more.
If you went by the Compubox stats, Calzaghe would have won 11 out of 12 rounds against Hopkins, but everyone agreed that fight was very close, and a few respected analysts scored it to Hopkins - which proves that Compubox stats have absolutely nothing to do with how a fight should be scored.
Comment