Who is the better WORLD CHAMPION: KHAN or FROCH?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hammerhiem
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 4877
    • 129
    • 102
    • 11,163

    #51
    Originally posted by wXh
    As an "established" world champion getting your ass exposed by a prospect>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting KTFO by a prospect with a 90% KO percentage.
    Ahh so you agree that Froch is an established champion and therefore by any logic is a better champion than a guy who hasn't had a single defence.

    thanks for clarifying that for us.

    Comment

    • hammerhiem
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 4877
      • 129
      • 102
      • 11,163

      #52
      Originally posted by -0-
      1. i never rated taylor that highly.

      2. taylor is shot.
      1. Answer the question.

      2. Kotelnik was never good enough to be considered shot.

      Comment

      • Stoppage
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 5637
        • 84
        • 92
        • 12,304

        #53
        Khan has more potential but so far as a world champion Froch is better.

        Comment

        • Poet682006
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2007
          • 17924
          • 1,181
          • 1,350
          • 26,849

          #54
          Neither: They both suck.

          Poet

          Comment

          • Blue Heffner
            Blackjack
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 15935
            • 373
            • 323
            • 24,659

            #55
            Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
            Talent & skillset dont mean **** in Boxing, its who's on your resume.
            yep but if I had to pick, I'd go with skills.

            I'm going with Froch because he has a better resume and it's getting better. Khan will never make it to Froch's level as far as resume goes.

            Comment

            • HeartAttack
              Linear Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 1262
              • 81
              • 49
              • 7,815

              #56
              NEITHER, since neither guy is a world champion. They are both titlist, in Froch's case if he wins the super 6 tournament than most likely he would be. I'm sure the finale would pit the two top super middleweights in the world against one another, thus re-establishing the title that Calzaghe vacated. Amir Khan, well he is a titlist at 140, where Manny Pacquiao is the current champ, but will probably reluingish that title in 6 months. Khan can conceivably still fight at 135 and there he has a chance of dethroning Juan Manuel Marquez, since he is getting a little old and wouldn't fight Khan for a bit.

              Comment

              • hookoutofhell
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 2752
                • 82
                • 52
                • 9,101

                #57
                right now id sayfroch because he has some quality wins over pascal and taylor but i think he loses massive credit for his dubious dec win over dirrell and the fact that he has such a shoddy style.

                in terms of overall skills and potential i think khan takes it.

                Comment

                • Shattered Jaw
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 5131
                  • 261
                  • 141
                  • 11,649

                  #58
                  This thread is a disgrace.

                  Comment

                  • slimshandy69
                    I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 3642
                    • 323
                    • 3
                    • 16,514

                    #59
                    Originally posted by hookoutofhell
                    right now id sayfroch because he has some quality wins over pascal and taylor but i think he loses massive credit for his dubious dec win over dirrell and the fact that he has such a shoddy style.

                    in terms of overall skills and potential i think khan takes it.

                    how was it dubious when froch bloodied dirrells face and froch had no marks...

                    learn your boxing...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP