Who is the better WORLD CHAMPION: KHAN or FROCH?

[WhoreUs]

The question was not about who has the best skills, it was who was the better Champion.

skills and potential mean nothing in terms of who is the better champion, resume > everything else..

and what has froch done to even say he has a better resume?

[hammerhiem]

and what has froch done to even say he has a better resume?

well Khan has no world level wins for starters.

Pascal and Taylor > Kotelnik and MAB.

[wXh]

The question was not about who has the best skills, it was who was the better Champion.

skills and potential mean nothing in terms of who is the better champion, resume > everything else..

So if resume is really more important than skills at defining a better world champion, how come Direll OUTBOXED Froch the entire fight with that wothless resume he had? Answer: Direll's boxing skills were supreme compared to Froch's.

[WhoreUs]

Khan ducked Maidana, Froch has fought Pascal, Taylor, and Dirrell. So my pick goes to Froch.

ducked maidana?

khan was at 135 before he fought kotelnik.

kotelnik has a win over maidana and was a champion.


who the hell knew maidana before he beat ortiz? he fought ortiz AFTER khan-kotelnik was already signed.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

at least khan is a rightful champion.


car froch on the other hand is not really a champion considering dirrell boxed his ears off.

[WhoreUs]

well Khan has no world level wins for starters.

Pascal and Taylor > Kotelnik and MAB.

no world level wins?

kotelnik was ranked higher at 140 than taylor was ranked at 168.

taylor had 1 win in his last 3 fights before fighting froch. taylor has now lost 4 of his last 5. that 1 win being against a shot jeff lacy.



give me a break. froch is a joke. he should have lost his last fight , pretty sure he'll lose his next one.

[BOX-A-LOT]

Skills and potential wise. Who is the better world champion? Amir Khan or Carl Froch?

I accidentally voted for Froch, lol.

Since you asked who has the better skills and potential. Definitely Khan!! There's no more potential for Froch, he's 33, he's at the end of the line. And, skills, what skills? lmao

Khan has the tools to be one of the best of his generation, so obviously the potential is there. We shall see.

[hammerhiem]

So if resume is really more important than skills at defining a better world champion, how come Direll OUTBOXED Froch the entire fight with that wothless resume he had? Answer: Direll's boxing skills were supreme compared to Froch's.

at what point did i say Froch was a good champ?

As it happen i think he sucks, but it doesn't mena that Khan is better, in fact Khan career so far has been a complete disappointment.

Poor performances against journeymen, KO in no time at all by a prospect who has turn out not to be anything special and since that KO he's fought a school teacher, a shot legend from 3 divsions below him that should have been a NC and won a title off the worst Champion in the three division he could have fought in. Now he's defending against a nobody hand picked to lose.

Froch as poor as he is has at least fought good opposition capable of asking him questions.

[mathed]

Amir by a mile easy

[Shattered Jaw]

This thread has to be a joke.

Froch is an infinitely superior champion.

Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell > Kotelnik?

Please, I thought we were better than this. I mean this is just a no brainer. I find it DISGRACEFUL that some consider Khan a better champion. I mean look at their next opponents... Kessler compared to Salita. LMFAO.