Adamek is making Chad Dawson look good.

**El_Cholo** · 10-30-2009, 08:24 AM

he beat a shot, over weight Golota.

hardly inspiring was it??

**#1Assassin** · 10-30-2009, 08:28 AM

Originally posted by Blairhoyle792

he beat a shot, over weight Golota.

hardly inspiring was it??

yeah.. size diffrence or not golota just sucks at this stage of his career. adamek has had some impressive performaces, but this just isnt one of em. 100% money fight, didnt prove anything.

**Texanballer** · 10-30-2009, 08:29 AM

Originally posted by Blairhoyle792

he beat a shot, over weight Golota.

hardly inspiring was it??

Since that fight Dawson had two gimme fights against mendoza and ruiz, life and death battle with Glen Johnson many people thought he lost, and two wins over a past prime Antonio Tarver is you want to be negative.

Meanwhile, Adamek moved up 30 pounds and stopped former undisputed Cruiserweight champion Oneil Bell, beat world title holder Steve Cunningham, and stopped undefeated prospect Johnathan Banks.

**djtmal** · 10-30-2009, 08:31 AM

Originally posted by Parody

If he keeps on winning like this, it will just show how good Chad Dawson is, the way he dominated him.

also makes all the talk hopkins had for moving up to cruiserweight sound quite fraudish, since he wound up making a fight with a shot roy jones instead...adamek was poised to put a hurtin on him...

**strugler** · 10-30-2009, 08:39 AM

NOVEMBER 14 will bring more people to boxing...

delete..............

**Guest** · 10-30-2009, 08:45 AM

Originally posted by Parody

If he keeps on winning like this, it will just show how good Chad Dawson is, the way he dominated him.

Adamek was always too big for light heavyweight. That's why he did so well at cruiser and now moved to heavyweight.

It was amazing he could even make 175 and defend there considering he's doing so well higher up.

He looked sluggish and drained against Dawson yet still managed to drop him late.

I think the fight would've been much closer had it been contested at cruiser although I do believe you should fight at your best weight which for Dawson is 175 and for Adamek it's cruiser.

**daggum** · 10-30-2009, 08:51 AM

Originally posted by texanballer

Since that fight Dawson had two gimme fights against mendoza and ruiz, life and death battle with Glen Johnson many people thought he lost, and two wins over a past prime Antonio Tarver is you want to be negative.

Meanwhile, Adamek moved up 30 pounds and stopped former undisputed Cruiserweight champion Oneil Bell, beat world title holder Steve Cunningham, and stopped undefeated prospect Johnathan Banks.

oneil bell was past his prime, life and death with cunningham and many people thought he lost and a gimme fight vs banks who was undefeated but fought nobody if you want to be negative.

fun huh!

**MANGLER** · 10-30-2009, 08:52 AM

Not really. That win was impressive tho. And Adamek over Golota means close to nothin.

**daggum** · 10-30-2009, 08:56 AM

Originally posted by jreckoning

Adamek was always too big for light heavyweight. That's why he did so well at cruiser and now moved to heavyweight.

It was amazing he could even make 175 and defend there considering he's doing so well higher up.

He looked sluggish and drained against Dawson yet still managed to drop him late.

I think the fight would've been much closer had it been contested at cruiser although I do believe you should fight at your best weight which for Dawson is 175 and for Adamek it's cruiser.

he fought there his whole career but he was always too big for it? your not supposed to actually believe these lame excuses after a fighter loses. overtrained, weightdrained, injured, sure thing etc...he also did well at cruiser cause he didnt have chad dawson there.

Adamek is making Chad Dawson look good.