That was no knockdown, even a fool can see it!
Why no De La Hoya-Whitaker II?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
cause oscar was HBO's golden child and they didnt want to risk him getting a loss. they wanted to keep cashing in firstComment
-
-
I can remember this being a good fight. I also remember Pernell feeling as though he won the fight (I agreed with him) and the controversy of the scoring of this fight, but why exactly wasn't there a rematch for this fight?
I mean, Oscar remained undefeated and this was only Pernell's 2nd loss...thoughts?Comment
-
-
Well DLH didn't and doesn't really like to do rematches was part of it but Whitaker tested positive for coke after the Pastriaev fight where he didn't look impressive anyway, took about a year off and then lost to Trinidad who of course went on to fight DLH later in the year, maybe he could've gotten a DLH rematch had he beaten Trinidad, who knows?Comment
-
Well DLH didn't and doesn't really like to do rematches was part of it but Whitaker tested positive for coke after the Pastriaev fight where he didn't look impressive anyway, took about a year off and then lost to Trinidad who of course went on to fight DLH later in the year, maybe he could've gotten a DLH rematch had he beaten Trinidad, who knows?Comment
Comment