The Ring Magazine Top 10 fighters of the 21st Century

[IronDanHamza]

He was spot on regarding Canelo

Again the problem with arguing from authority fallacy means you have to agree with everthing they say. You can't pick and chose when it suits you.

So in essence you're agreeing with him that Pacquaio ducked Floyd in 2009.

[djtmal]

Again the problem .

It's no problem I said Canelo isn't an all time great

[IronDanHamza]

It's no problem I said Canelo isn't an all time great

If you read, the problem for you is you're using Teddy Atlas opinion as an argument from authority. Meaning, you have to accept all his opinions as your own, such as, Pacquaio ducking Floyd in 2009.

Why do you continue? You understand how badly you're being humiliated or do you genuinely not?

[djtmal]

Again the problem with arguing from authority fallacy .

That's a you problem

[djtmal]

If you read, the problem for you is you're using Teddy Atlas opinion

That's a you problem

[IronDanHamza]

That's a you problem

It's quite literally a you problem, as you're the only person that's using that fallacy argument.

You don't know what basic terms mean and it's sad

[djtmal]

, such as, Pacquaio ducking Floyd in 2009.

That's a Floyd boy problem

Floyd ducked Manny

[IronDanHamza]

That's a Floyd boy problem

Floyd ducked Manny

Take it up with Teddy Atlas.

He's the one who said it and you agree with all of his views.

[djtmal]

It's quite literally a you problem:

No it's really a you problem

You can't understand why many posters agree that Canelo is not an all time great, so you have to cook up some non descript garbage

[IronDanHamza]

No it's really a you problem

You can't understand why many posters agree that Canelo is not an all time great, so you have to cook up some non descript garbage

You are the one who randomly brought Teddy Atlas into it as an authority, dumbass

Meaning it is literally a you problem