Comments Thread For: The Beltline: Why aren?t George Foreman and the Charlo twins helping retired boxers?

[Smash]

one of his ex wives im reading accused him of ra-pe as well, i think she was one of the 3

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12042523/George-Foreman-accused-child-sexual-abuse-woman.html

[famicommander]

You’re entitled to believe what you want to but you can’t say he is that, because we have no evidence of that being the truth.

It’s an accusation from you, just as is theirs.

I can, and in fact, did say he is that. I'm not a criminal court. Three different kids who have absolute proof they spent extended amounts of time with him saying he ******ed them is enough for me.

I'll say it again. If three different kids that don't know each other but can prove you spent extended amounts of time with them call you a pedo, you're a pedo.

[IronDanHamza]

I can, and in fact, did say he is that. I'm not a criminal court. Three different kids who have absolute proof they spent extended amounts of time with him saying he ******ed them is enough for me.

I'll say it again. If three different kids that don't know each other but can prove you spent extended amounts of time with them call you a pedo, you're a pedo.

That actually isn’t evidence you’re a pedo. That’s just someone claiming you’re a pedo.

I’m not interested if it’s “enough for you” that’s just your opinion and nothing more. That isn’t evidence for it being true. We don’t know if it’s true or not and he’s never been convicted of it in any capacity so again you’re entitled to your opinion but that’s all it is.

I’m sure there’s multiple people on here who would accuse you of being a pedophile. It wouldn’t surprise me to be honest. But I can’t just turn around and say you are one, without sufficient evidence. Accusations aren’t evidence.

[famicommander]

That actually isn’t evidence you’re a pedo. That’s just someone claiming you’re a pedo.

I’m not interested if it’s “enough for you” that’s just your opinion and nothing more. That isn’t evidence for it being true. We don’t know if it’s true or not and he’s never been convicted of it in any capacity so again you’re entitled to your opinion but that’s all it is.

I’m sure there’s multiple people on here who would accuse you of being a pedophile. It wouldn’t surprise me to be honest. But I can’t just turn around and say you are one, without sufficient evidence. Accusations aren’t evidence.

None of the people on this site have ever met me, there's no reason to even entertain any accusations. The three people that accused Foreman have absolute proof they spent huge amounts of time with him. Three kids who didn't know each other that can prove you spent time alone with them calling you a pedo is not a coincidence. I genuinely don't care if you're offended that it's enough for me to call someone a pedo when three kids that can prove they spent time alone with a guy calls him a pedo.

But then again, you just read an article where George admitted to hitting women and the article pointed out he paid out 30K to an accuser over a battery change and still won't call him a woman beater.

[IronDanHamza]

None of the people on this site have ever met me, there's no reason to even entertain any accusations. The three people that accused Foreman have absolute proof they spent huge amounts of time with him. Three kids who didn't know each other that can prove you spent time alone with them calling you a pedo is not a coincidence. I genuinely don't care if you're offended that it's enough for me to call someone a pedo when three kids that can prove they spent time alone with a guy calls him a pedo.

But then again, you just read an article where George admitted to hitting women and the article pointed out he paid out 30K to an accuser over a battery change and still won't call him a woman beater.

It doesn’t matter. An accusation is an accusation. I do think you do show traits of a pedophile if I’m being totally honest, and I’m sure others would agree. That said, I can’t say you are one one because I don’t know. Just like we don’t know about Foreman. That’s the long and short of it, you can call him a pedophile but that’s just your opinion/accusation and nothing more.

You say they have “absolute proof”. What is it?

In regards to being a woman beater, if he paid the woman then I guess that is an admission of guilt. So, the woman beater is a fair claim.

[famicommander]

It doesn’t matter. An accusation is an accusation. I do think you do show traits of a pedophile if I’m being totally honest, and I’m sure others would agree. That said, I can’t say you are one one because I don’t know. Just like we don’t know about Foreman. That’s the long and short of it, you can call him a pedophile but that’s just your opinion/accusation and nothing more.

You say they have “absolute proof”. What is it?

In regards to being a woman beater, if he paid the woman then I guess that is an admission of guilt. So, the woman beater is a fair claim.

I said they had absolute proof they spent time alone with him, not that they had absolute proof of their accusations. Foreman has 3 people that knew him while underaged accusing him of misconduct. I have nobody accusing me because I've never done anything like that and never will.

If 3 people that can prove they spent time alone with you independently accuse you of the same behavior, that's more than enough to wear the label. Again, this isn't a court of law. I don't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Three independent accusers with an established history with the guy is not nearly the same as you deciding someone on the internet is a pedophile because they point out bad behavior by your favorite fighters or because they're bi.

[IronDanHamza]

I said they had absolute proof they spent time alone with him, not that they had absolute proof of their accusations. Foreman has 3 people that knew him while underaged accusing him of misconduct. I have nobody accusing me because I've never done anything like that and never will.

If 3 people that can prove they spent time alone with you independently accuse you of the same behavior, that's more than enough to wear the label. Again, this isn't a court of law. I don't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Three independent accusers with an established history with the guy is not nearly the same as you deciding someone on the internet is a pedophile because they point out bad behavior by your favorite fighters or because they're bi.

You say that, but that’s just your words.

Foreman denied it also. Foreman has never been proven to be a pedophile just like you haven’t.

I haven’t decided you’re a pedophile. I’ve done the opposite. I can’t say you’re a pedophile despite the fact you do come across as potentially one. But I can’t say you are because there’s no evidence that you are. It’s you that’s decided Foreman is a pedophile with no sufficient evidence.

You said these three people have absolute proof they spent time with Foreman. What proof is that out of curiosity? And even if they can, that isn’t evidence of what they accused him of as being true.

Again yes you can happily label him whatever you want but all it is is an accusation and opinion. Nothing more.