Mayweather's resume is massively overrated comapre to BUD

[satiev1]

Almost every one of those hall of famers that he beat were shot or past their prime.

Manny- koed cold by marquez and then floyd fought him
maidana-already lost to many fighters including khan and alexander
canelo - catch weight weigth drained and green. He would get more credit if he faced him at 154.
Cotto- koed bad by margartia and manny
Judah- koed by kostya
Mitchell- koed by kostya
mosley- shot. Lost twice to forrest and twice to winky. (floyd also ducked winky)
de la hoya- shot and it was a sd life and death win. Koed by hopkins before. He retired two fights after.

Floyd didn't fight a lot of guys that were undefeated in their prime. His best wins are below that were undefeated in their prime.

1. Corrales undefeated - top 5 p4p
2. Hatton - TOP TEN P4P undefeated coming off kostya win
3. Canelo - but it was a cw.
4. Castillo- great win but many thought he lost first fight

Compare it to bud. It's not that far off. Bud has more better undefeated wins against undefeated young hungry lions in their prime than floyd does. In fact, the spence win is better than any win floyd has in his whole career. It was a p4p top 5 fighter who many thought would beat floyd.

Not only that bud BUd never made excuses, never made you do a blood test, never avoid anyone, and moved up 3 weight classes to fight canelo with no cw. Money floyd isn't in the same universe as Crawford. Also Bud never had any questionable close fights unlike floyd with castillo and sd win against de la hoya. It was always utter domination.

Spence > corrales win

135- undefeated prime gamboa
140 - undefeated prime postol
147 - undefeated prime spence top 4 p4p
154- undefeated prime madrimov
168- prime canelo

[hugh grant]

I really feel floyds career should not be talked about. Far too cautious to have talking points of any significance.

Only talking points of interest for floyd is why he didn't fight Thurman, bud, spence, bradley, brook, khan. Why he used cw with nelo? Why he didn't fight abroad? Why was floyd so worried about maidanas gloves? None of which is good!

[MalevolentBite]

I cant even take this serious. Spence? A faded kell brook and Amir Khan? A blown up Gamboa? Jeff Horn? Jeff Horn? A washed up Shawn Porter? Some Russian. Some African. He never faced tim Bradley who was under top rank, never faced Pacquiao who was under top rank.

Dont get me wrong Crawford is great no shade but his weakest link is his resume names. Crawford got the accolades but Floyd got the names. We will see who will remember him in 20 years. It isnt like Crawford was a big market in boxing. He will be like Aaron Pryor. Great but forgotten.

This new generation jumps from one hero to the next hero. Internet moves way faster than text books. Floyd came in during the last years of real boxing journalism not youtube boxing channels filled with casuals trying to make a quick buck.

[Carpe Diem]

Here we go….

[The Big Dunn]

Here we go again- a disgruntled fan of Manny and Eastern European boxers with an axe to grind is trying to lessen Floyd yet again.

What is with these guys?

[Coverdale]

But "muh PPV numbers".

[Bennyleonard99]

Floyd was the biggest fraud in boxing history. He even brags about being a coward and how being a coward made him rich in boxing. Floyd ruined boxing with his handpicking and ducking, he is the reason why American boxing is dead now after Crawford who thank God is everything Floyd was not. Crawford unified THREE divisions, Floyd never unified nothing.

[HisExcellency]

Almost every one of those hall of famers that he beat were shot or past their prime.

Manny- koed cold by marquez and then floyd fought him
maidana-already lost to many fighters including khan and alexander
canelo - catch weight weigth drained and green. He would get more credit if he faced him at 154.
Cotto- koed bad by margartia and manny
Judah- koed by kostya
Mitchell- koed by kostya
mosley- shot. Lost twice to forrest and twice to winky. (floyd also ducked winky)
de la hoya- shot and it was a sd life and death win. Koed by hopkins before. He retired two fights after.

Floyd didn't fight a lot of guys that were undefeated in their prime. His best wins are below that were undefeated in their prime.

1. Corrales undefeated - top 5 p4p
2. Hatton - TOP TEN P4P undefeated coming off kostya win
3. Canelo - but it was a cw.
4. Castillo- great win but many thought he lost first fight

Compare it to bud. It's not that far off. Bud has more better undefeated wins against undefeated young hungry lions in their prime than floyd does. In fact, the spence win is better than any win floyd has in his whole career. It was a p4p top 5 fighter who many thought would beat floyd.

Not only that bud BUd never made excuses, never made you do a blood test, never avoid anyone, and moved up 3 weight classes to fight canelo with no cw. Money floyd isn't in the same universe as Crawford. Also Bud never had any questionable close fights unlike floyd with castillo and sd win against de la hoya. It was always utter domination.

Spence > corrales win

135- undefeated prime gamboa
140 - undefeated prime postol
147 - undefeated prime spence top 4 p4p
154- undefeated prime madrimov
168- prime canelo

The ONLY problem with your theory is that when it's all said and done, Crawford has only defeated ONE HoF fighter whereas Mayweather & Pacquiao have beaten at least half a dozen each so will go down higher in the history books. Also, Crawford beat both Spence & Canelo at the end of their career's after one had suffered a life-changing car crash (and hasn't fought since) whereas the other had been through multiple wars and lost a couple.

In fact, if boxing WASN'T corrupt, the version of Canelo that Crawford beat should have a couple of extra losses to his name against Golovkin!

[Grandma Lover]

Here we go….

You're absolute worse nightmare lmfao


Terrence "The Real TBE" Crawford

[Grandma Lover]

Don't forget Crawford isn't a drug cheat like froid was.