International Boxing Research Organization’s Top 25 All Time Great Rankings

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SouthpawRight
    The Soviet Step
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2024
    • 3311
    • 903
    • 855
    • 0

    #1

    International Boxing Research Organization’s Top 25 All Time Great Rankings

    what do you think of the list

    Originally posted by QueensburyRules
    2019 IBRO p4p-
    1. Ray Robinson (602)
    2. Henry Armstrong (536)
    3. Harry Greb (499)
    4. Sam Langford (395)
    5. Roberto Duran (376)
    6. Wille Pep (371)
    7. Muhammad Ali (368)
    8. Joe Louis (351)
    9. Benny Leonard (335)
    10. Ray Leonard (265)
    11. Joe Gans (248)
    12. Bob Fitzsimmons (217)
    13. Ezzard Charles (200)
    14. Mickey Walker (178)
    15. Archie Moore (138)
    16. Eder Jofre (134)
    17. Jimmy Wilde (117)
    18. Jack Dempsey (80)
    19. Jack Johnson (79)
    20. Gene Tunney (74)
    21. Barney Ross (68)
    22. Floyd Mayweather Jr. (67)
    23. Stanley Ketchel (61)
    24. Tony Canzoneri (60)
    25. Manny Pacquiao (55)
    Just Missing the Cut (50 points or more) Carlos Monzon (54). A total of 65 boxers received votes (at least 1 point) in this poll.
  • Willow The Wisp
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2020
    • 4402
    • 2,150
    • 3,140
    • 1,037

    #2
    It's fully dependent on your personal concept of how "Greatness" is best defined. Most people's fall pretty close inside the bulls eye circle, but even in there you can have some variance in how the essential aspects chosen are weighted.

    Obviously, the IBRO posts up a sound list, but some fans might be a little off put by the heavy presence of old timers from before, say; the 1950s.

    Comment

    • Haka
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 2626
      • 565
      • 538
      • 8,427

      #3
      Usyk head to head the best to put on gloves.

      Comment

      • SouthpawRight
        The Soviet Step
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2024
        • 3311
        • 903
        • 855
        • 0

        #4
        Originally posted by Willow The Wisp
        It's fully dependent on your personal concept of how "Greatness" is best defined. Most people's fall pretty close inside the bulls eye circle, but even in there you can have some variance in how the essential aspects chosen are weighted.

        Obviously, the IBRO posts up a sound list, but some fans might be a little off put by the heavy presence of old timers from before, say; the 1950s.
        would love to see their scoring criteria

        for example how tf is Eder Jofre well ahead of manny

        It seems a fighter’s cultural significance is a factor in their criteria

        Comment

        • SouthpawRight
          The Soviet Step
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2024
          • 3311
          • 903
          • 855
          • 0

          #5
          Originally posted by Haka
          Usyk head to head the best to put on gloves.
          Usyk is great but no head to head beast

          many of his biggest fights are razor thin decisions

          Aura of invincibility must be cultivated to be a H2H best

          Comment

          • Haka
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 2626
            • 565
            • 538
            • 8,427

            #6
            Originally posted by SouthpawRight
            Usyk is great but no head to head beast

            many of his biggest fights are razor thin decisions

            Aura of invincibility must be cultivated to be a H2H best
            Aura invincibility of whom ?

            Comment

            • The D3vil
              WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2016
              • 6103
              • 1,534
              • 1,353
              • 56,286

              #7
              About as great of a list as you can make

              Comment

              • The Big Dunce
                Up and Comer
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Jul 2025
                • 70
                • 24
                • 15
                • 0

                #8
                There can always be arguments made for or against those on or off the list. Several on this list that would not make my list. Doesn't mean they weren't good or even great, but not in my top 25.

                Comment

                • drablj
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 624
                  • 219
                  • 577
                  • 17,293

                  #9
                  i strongly disagree that jack johnson, dempsey and ketchel are better than floyd and manny p4p. no way. ketchel isn't top100 ever anymore. short reign (and life) with few defenses (only 2 great fighters defeated) isn't enough.
                  it's not because of their era. terry mcgovern is from the same era as ketchel and he's clearly better. mcgovern knocked out reigning bantamweight, featherweight and lightweight champions of the world when there were 6 divisions and then light heavyweight was created. he knocked out joe gans in the meantime too. p4p terry is better than ketchel, dempsey (very inactive) and johnson (terrible reign) but people love heavyweights for some reason.
                  i don't agree with some other people on that list (ross too isn't better than floyd and manny) but ketchel is just laughable. hagler, monzon and hopkins are better from his own division. salvador sanchez died even younger and he defeated 3 hall of famers. i don't see his name on the list.

                  Comment

                  • SouthpawRight
                    The Soviet Step
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2024
                    • 3311
                    • 903
                    • 855
                    • 0

                    #10
                    Originally posted by drablj
                    i strongly disagree that jack johnson, dempsey and ketchel are better than floyd and manny p4p. no way. ketchel isn't top100 ever anymore. short reign (and life) with few defenses (only 2 great fighters defeated) isn't enough.
                    it's not because of their era. terry mcgovern is from the same era as ketchel and he's clearly better. mcgovern knocked out reigning bantamweight, featherweight and lightweight champions of the world when there were 6 divisions and then light heavyweight was created. he knocked out joe gans in the meantime too. p4p terry is better than ketchel, dempsey (very inactive) and johnson (terrible reign) but people love heavyweights for some reason.
                    i don't agree with some other people on that list (ross too isn't better than floyd and manny) but ketchel is just laughable. hagler, monzon and hopkins are better from his own division. salvador sanchez died even younger and he defeated 3 hall of famers. i don't see his name on the list.
                    the names you mentioned plus Gene Tunney

                    sounds like nostalgic bias or they were voting based on cultural impact

                    their list did open my eyes to Mickey Walker though

                    no discipline but a legend he'd show up to fights intoxicated and still win ultimately becoming an all time great

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP