Im sick of these people trying make a case for that loser Froch

[elgaringo]

I don't understand this running bit. Did he clinch excessively? Yes. Run? Huh???

Of course he ran! and didnt punch quite enough! If he'd have stood his ground a little more the judges would have been kinder to him. its just not good to watch all that back peddling

[IMDAZED]

Of course he ran! and didnt punch quite enough! If he'd have stood his ground a little more the judges would have been kinder to him. its just not good to watch all that back peddling

I don't know, it appeared to me he punched a lot more than the other guy. And landed a lot more too. Guy must be magician to pull that off while running.

[MELLY-MEL...]

for me they both deserved a draw, or a dq. that was a horrible fight on both counts. ****!

[Hitman Hodgson]

Yeah, it was ****. Dirrell won't be able to draw flies after that. Mind you, its a good job Froch has been in some good fights in the past other wise noone would want to watch one of his fights again either.

[Bushidō]

I'm a Froch supporter but I think he lost. Wasn't a robbery or anything but Dirrell didn't do himself any favors but holding so much

[Ryn0]

If anyone should have been DQ'd it was Froch for those rabbit punches, Dirrell schooled him.

[Dynamite Kid]

the rounds were close and a lot could have gone either way! I like both fighters but prefer dirrells style. My impression after the fight was a point win either way or preferably a draw. I was suprised how 2 judges had it 3 points for froch, but a robbery it was NOT!!!!!!!!!

The rounds were not close because Froch made them competitive, they were close because Dirrell did what he had to, to win the rounds, if you watch that fight closely for what actually lands Dirrell won clearly, even with a point deduction.

[The Gambler1981]

I have yet to see a solid case made for Froch and really do not know what he did to win the fight. I know what Dirrelll did that is how he fights and he even though he looked sloppy and held a good deal that does not really change that he was the one landing the cleaner effective punches. To me Froch did zero in the fight so even if Dirrell was not really dominating he was doing something, something is much greater then nothing.

Out of all the so-called "bad decisions" this year I can make cases for either side in Berto-Collazo, John-Juarez 1, Cotto-Clottey and Diaz-Malinaggi I can make a case for either side winning those fight (or a draw) in this fight I can not find a way to make a case for Froch to win more then four rounds. Really I can not think of a worse decision this year in a big fight, it might not be a robbery but it is pretty bad.

[THE REED]

me and 2 of my friends were screaming at the tv about all of frochs rabbit punches... every other second it was a punch to the back of the head

[S A M U R A I]

me and 2 of my friends were screaming at the tv about all of frochs rabbit punches... every other second it was a punch to the back of the head

I hear ya reed, although I wasn't quite screaming at the TV because it was 3 AM in my house. I can't believe Froch got away with such blatantly dirty tactics.

If Froch was winning this fight fairly, why did he feel the need to cheat? That mother****er knew he was losing and being made to look like an amateur. I'm not even a Froch basher, I've been supportive of him until now, but he fought like ****.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3