Im sick of these people trying make a case for that loser Froch

[kadyo's]

The fans are the real judges, everyone knows that.

20 years from now, all these fans won't care and what people would care about are the official records.

[starjammer]

Yeah watched it again last night and had Dirrell winning again.

Dirrell landed much more effective shots thoughout the fight. I don't care what he did to get those shots or what he didn't do, the fact is he landed them on Froch's head. People are making the argument that 'Ok he landed them but he , he ran, he kneeled down, he turned away'

You are right about all those things, but they do not negate the fact that Dirrell outlanded Froch.

I would fold to the Froch crowd if infact Froch had been effective with his aggression, but Dirrell made Froch look like a fool.

So yeah, more precise shots landed and Froch didn't do enough to take the fight on aggression.

My live scoring of the fight 7 rounds Dirrell 3 Froch and 2 even
Last night's viewing 7 rounds Dirrell 4 Froch and 1 even

[Dynamite Kid]

20 years from now, all these fans won't care and what people would care about are the official records.

Really? Hagler vs Leonard gets brought up a lot, so does JLR vs Whitaker 1 and there are less high profile fights that get brought up.

Anyway regardless whether it gets brought up or not it does not mean Froch won the fair and square so.....

[Shadow boxer 3]

dirrel landed the cleaner shots and froch was the aggresser. but like tarver said, it depends on what the judges are lookin for

[Double]

Direll's corner summed it up between the 11th and 12th rounds: "you are not going to get a decision here.."

[T-97]

To be honest, it wasn't a robbery. It was , I think some people are getting carried away with how well Dirrell did as most of us expected him to be blown away. That said, I did think that Dirrell deserved the win from watching, but I didn't score it. He did well, but he didn't "pwn" or "dominate" Froch in the way some are claiming.

That said... Froch better step his game up if he expects to win this ****, he was lucky to get the nod in that one... I doubt he'll be so lucky twice.

[Dynamite Kid]

To be honest, it wasn't a robbery. It was , I think some people are getting carried away with how well Dirrell did as most of us expected him to be blown away. That said, I did think that Dirrell deserved the win from watching, but I didn't score it. He did well, but he didn't "pwn" or "dominate" Froch in the way some are claiming.

That said... Froch better step his game up if he expects to win this ****, he was lucky to get the nod in that one... I doubt he'll be so lucky twice.

No offence but you need to have scored the fight, its not that he was pwning Froch round by round, no one is saying that, its that he was winning more rounds.

Anyone can look at a fight without scoring it and think a fight its a closer fight than it actually is because you always get a perception of who looked!!!! like they had won the fight etc, but when you actually tally your scorecard up you can have the fight much wider than you originally anticipated.

You need to score the fight and score it on what actually! lands because if you do this you wil realize that Froch was extremely lucky to win the fight.

You dont have to win rounds wide to win them, there is normally always a winner or loser to a round so regardless whether you win it big or not you have still won it.

[rskumm21]

How the **** is it running when you move out of the way of a punch, land a 2-3 punch combination, then move away as to not get hit? I think they call that boxing last time I checked.

[T-97]

No offence but you need to have scored the fight, its not that he was pwning Froch round by round, no one is saying that, its that he was winning more rounds.

Anyone can look at a fight without scoring it and think a fight its a closer fight than it actually is because you always get a perception of who looked!!!! like they had won the fight etc, but when you actually tally your scorecard up you can have the fight much wider than you originally anticipated.

You need to score the fight and score it on what actually! lands because if you do this you wil realize that Froch was extremely lucky to win the fight.

You dont have to win rounds wide to win them, there is normally always a winner or loser to a round so regardless whether you win it big or not you have still won it.

I know man, that's why I'm holding back on giving a real opinion on it until I get a chance to score it. I'm just saying that those who were acting as if Dirrell dominated the entire fight and was robbed blind are over-reacting, some rounds were close... although, any clearly won rounds were by Dirrell from what I remember.

[rskumm21]

No he ran, clinched, fell over and bitched to the ref like a coward. But he still won on my card regardless. Says a lot about Froch's performance.

So let me get this straight. If you we're constantly getting hit in the back of the head and it was illegal and the ref wasn't saying anything, you'd just stand there and let it keep happening right?