Im sick of these people trying make a case for that loser Froch

[Dynamite Kid]

It tells you that Hearns, Hagler, and Leonard would not have stood a chance.

On a serious note, I think it's clear that the refs of these fights need to be on the same level of a Bayless, Smoger, Mercante, etc.

Don't take this as me saying they need to be American refs, those are just the refs that I know that are top shelf. Not too familiar with the names of European judges.

I dont have a problem with an American referee, most Euro refs suck!

[shabs]

Your idiotism knows no limits it seems... Dirrell shoulda been DQ'd! Moron.

u kidding over 15 rabbit punches from froch and a body slammed and he wasnt even warned...plz man watch a boxing fight clinching is part of the gaame watch b-hop fight watch shane destroy plaster boy c'mon froch is dirty just like that ref they had in there taking away a point cause he knew froch was down and what he was getting paid to do was create an unfair advantage for yung dirty froch

[S A M U R A I]

Im sick of these people trying make a case for that loser Froch.

Plain and basic commonsense.

How do you win a fight where you are out landed in almost every rounds and you dont score the cleaner harder shots? Froch was also hurt in the fight.

You can pretend all you like but you know what i just said is an undisputed fact!!!!!!

If Froch was landing the volume and Dirrell was landing the cleaner shots sporadically i could understand someone calling Froch the winner, but how do you get outworked &!!!!!! not land the cleaner shots and win the fight.

Its absolutely ******ed to think Froch won that fight, it was not even a close fight, the only thing that was close about the fight was how narrowly the rounds were won, they were not won narrowly because Froch made them competitive they were won narrowly because Dirrell threw as much as he needed to throw to take the rounds. Even if you dont think Dirrell won there is no way Froch won, even the most biased Froch fan applying some commonsense would have to say Dirrell did enough not to lose to get a draw.


GET A CLUE FROCH SUPPORTERS

I agree with you DK, but I think you're wasting your time because you won't get through to them. From what I've seen on here for the last couple of days Froch's fans are thicker than two short planks. They have very little knowledge of boxing.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Dynamite Kid]

I agree with you DK, but I think you're wasting your time because you won't get through to them. From what I've seen on here for the last couple of days Froch's fans are thicker than two short planks. They have very little knowledge of boxing.

I know, it does however make me smile when they say stuff like " go watch the fight again, you dont know how score a fight, Froch was coming foward, Dirrell ran" lol

Thats right Dirrell ran and yet he still outlanded Froch, so it just goes to show he cant have been moving that much and not sticking can he?

[NorvernRob]

Froch fan here...

And yes as i've said before, I think Dirrell won. I had it 7-4-1 initially, and the same on a rewatch.

But

Falling over, turning your back, constant complaining and holding doesn't do you any favours and probably cost Dirrell the decision - i'm glad because I think it will be the making of him, he knows now he doesn't have to do that **** in a fight, he's got enough speed and skill to do well.

As for Froch, well he didn't really deserve the decision either -I have no idea why he had Dirrell backed up but wasn't throwing punches. If he was worried about the speed he should have just thrown even more not less, it's not as if he isn't well conditioned.

He'd better step his game up for Kessler.

[IMDAZED]

No he ran, clinched, fell over and bitched to the ref like a coward. But he still won on my card regardless. Says a lot about Froch's performance.

I don't understand this running bit. Did he clinch excessively? Yes. Run? Huh???

[S A M U R A I]

I know, it does however make me smile when they say stuff like " go watch the fight again, you dont know how score a fight, Froch was coming foward, Dirrell ran" lol

Thats right Dirrell ran and yet he still outlanded Froch, so it just goes to show he cant have been moving that much and not sticking can he?

How many punches did Froch actually land? I haven't seen any stats for this fight but I reckon it's probably an embarrassingly low number.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Dynamite Kid]

How many punches did Froch actually land? I haven't seen any stats for this fight but I reckon it's probably an embarrassingly low number.

I dont know, but yes more than likely a pitiful number.

[elgaringo]

Im sick of these people trying make a case for that loser Froch.

Plain and basic commonsense.

How do you win a fight where you are out landed in almost every rounds and you dont score the cleaner harder shots? Froch was also hurt in the fight.

You can pretend all you like but you know what i just said is an undisputed fact!!!!!!

If Froch was landing the volume and Dirrell was landing the cleaner shots sporadically i could understand someone calling Froch the winner, but how do you get outworked &!!!!!! not land the cleaner shots and win the fight.

Its absolutely ******ed to think Froch won that fight, it was not even a close fight, the only thing that was close about the fight was how narrowly the rounds were won, they were not won narrowly because Froch made them competitive they were won narrowly because Dirrell threw as much as he needed to throw to take the rounds. Even if you dont think Dirrell won there is no way Froch won, even the most biased Froch fan applying some commonsense would have to say Dirrell did enough not to lose to get a draw.


GET A CLUE FROCH SUPPORTERS

the rounds were close and a lot could have gone either way! I like both fighters but prefer dirrells style. My impression after the fight was a point win either way or preferably a draw. I was suprised how 2 judges had it 3 points for froch, but a robbery it was NOT!!!!!!!!!

[Hitman Hodgson]

I was at ringside for the fight and I thought it was **** fight with lots of close rounds, I've watched the Showtime coverage and I think Bernstein is pretty much right, it was a very hard fight to score. I had Dirrell by 1 point. If he'd have fought the first 9 rounds like he did the last 3 he would've won easily - it was by no means the robbery some people are making it out to be. I read a stat that he (Dirrell) only threw 20 punches in the first 4 or 5 rounds... You can't win a world title being that negative. But saying that Froch was dire at times and seemed to be thinking far too much at times when he should've just let his hands go. He has a lot of work to do if he's going to beat Kessler, but stylistically its probably a better fight for Froch as he won't have to go looking for Kessler as much as he did Dirrell but still if Kessler is still prime (which lets be honest we can't be certein he is, he hasn't fought a world class opponent since Calzaghe, and by the time the Froch fight takes place will be over 3 years ago) she should have too much for Froch. But either way it will be a great fight to watch.