Im sick of these people trying make a case for that loser Froch

[BoxingChaos]

Direll's corner summed it up between the 11th and 12th rounds: "you are not going to get a decision here.."

And you did too much running then you resorted to holding and you got a point taken away. No way you are going to get a decision with that piss poor performance.

[Shadows]

What I don't get is, there was several times during the fight when Dirrell backed himself into a corner, and the two just looked at one another.

It was during moments like these that Froch should have gone to work.

Instead, he just chased Dirrell around as he moved out of the corner. He could not cut the ring off. You'd figure that they would've know that'd be Dirrell's plan.

[rskumm21]

20 years from now, all these fans won't care and what people would care about are the official records.

That's bull****, because people are still arguing over close fights that took place more than 20 years ago. Just check the boxing history forums.

[shade darkar]

at the end of the day peeps, i think froch knows deep down that he is nowhere near as good as he thinks he is and he isnt fit to clean calzaghes boots.

[Uturn]

Dirrell was robbed but Froch has the win on his record, get over it and move on.

[starjammer]

at the end of the day peeps, i think froch knows deep down that he is nowhere near as good as he thinks he is and he isnt fit to clean calzaghes boots.

In Froch's mind he probabaly believes he stopped Dirrell

[Dynamite Kid]

What I don't get is, there was several times during the fight when Dirrell backed himself into a corner, and the two just looked at one another.

It was during moments like these that Froch should have gone to work.

Instead, he just chased Dirrell around as he moved out of the corner. He could not cut the ring off. You'd figure that they would've know that'd be Dirrell's plan.

That is precisely what im talking about when i said Froch was wrong to load all the negative tactics onto Dirrell because he was just as guilty of it, difference being if he could of made it stick he to would of been content to stink out the joint, he had hand it anyway.

[Shadows]

That is precisely what im talking about when i said Froch was wrong to load all the negative tactics onto Dirrell because he was just as guilty of it, difference being if he could of made it stick he to would of been content to stink out the joint, he had hand it anyway.

For me it wasn't even the rabbit punches, but the punch on the break and the hip toss.

You can accuse Dirrell of holding, but that was uncalled for.

[Dynamite Kid]

For me it wasn't even the rabbit punches, but the punch on the break and the hip toss.

You can accuse Dirrell of holding, but that was uncalled for.

It makes me laugh how people say Dirrell should of been D'Q'd when Froch should of also lost a point for a blatant body slam and could of been thrown out altogether with another ref.


The rabbits punches, punches on the break are some of the cleaner work that Froch did, what does that tell us.

[Shadows]

It makes me laugh how people say Dirrell should of been D'Q'd when Froch should of also lost a point for a blatant body slam and could of been thrown out altogether with another ref.


The rabbits punches, punches on the break are some of the cleaner work that Froch did, what does that tell us.

It tells you that Hearns, Hagler, and Leonard would not have stood a chance.

On a serious note, I think it's clear that the refs of these fights need to be on the same level of a Bayless, Smoger, Mercante, etc.

Don't take this as me saying they need to be American refs, those are just the refs that I know that are top shelf. Not too familiar with the names of European judges.