Comments Thread For: Harlem Eubank accuses Carl Frampton of foul play in loss to Jack Catterall

[BoxingUpdates]

Harlem Eubank was not happy with the way his fight against Jack Catterall ended, writes Tom Ivers.
[Click Here To Read More]

[Curtis2]

Catterall will have better competition options for his next move. Eubank couldn’t defend the left hand landing at will.

[MulaKO]

Are all the Eubank’s delirious ???

[bcalvert1]

I'd have no interest in watching Eubank fight again...

[Fanofreason]

He does have a point. They did say the doctor in Eubanks corner stopped the fight.

[Joseph]

I don’t want to see Harlem Eubank again. He is an awful fighter.

[786]

Eubank won a round at best. If Catterall was willing to commit more rather than just being a counter puncher then it could've been a beat down. Eubank seemed well out of his depth, he was completely lost in there.

[rudy]

Catterall has is and always is boring fighter, the blame on Eubank is so wrong and yes commentary was bias how they fought the doctor stopped the fight because of Eubank eye and Catterall corner stopped the fight not the doctor disgusting and shameful when your not. DAZN promoted fighter

[Corelone]

Its hard to blame Eubank for falling into Cat's ennui. Not that he won, but it was a mirror image of Cat, move for move. Like playing chess with a copy cat.

[slimPickings]

Eubank strikes me as someone who will do well at most sport but not excel in any including boxing. It certainly did not help that he did not have the experience going against a tricky experienced fighter who is not easy to look good against.