What Does a Victory at 46 do for Pacquiao?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • famicommander
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2018
    • 9906
    • 5,462
    • 1
    • 49,546

    #11
    Originally posted by Grandma Lover

    Well the ugas was a bait and switch considering ugas was training to fight a southpaw and his original opponent was a righty. Yeah I agree with the last sentence since alot of past great lost to younger fighters but that was passing of the torch and they lost to great fighters. Mario isn't one of them.

    Barrios is trash.
    It wasn't a bait and switch you absolute buffoon. Ugas was specifically given a low tier opponent he didn't have to bother training for because he was supposed to be the emergency replacement for either Spence or Pacquiao. Spence had a recent injury history and Pacquiao was on the wrong side of 40. There was every reason for the promoters to have a replacement guy ready, and there was every reason for Ugas to spar a southpaw.

    You're an absolute mark if you think Pacquiao didn't know there was an explicit possibility he'd be fighting Ugas. He's been around, he knew why Ugas was on the card. And the same would have applied to Spence if Pacquiao had been the one to pull out.

    Comment

    • Grandma Lover
      IronMikesDaddy
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Mar 2025
      • 659
      • 181
      • 39
      • 0

      #12
      Originally posted by famicommander

      It wasn't a bait and switch you absolute buffoon. Ugas was specifically given a low tier opponent he didn't have to bother training for because he was supposed to be the emergency replacement for either Spence or Pacquiao. Spence had a recent injury history and Pacquiao was on the wrong side of 40. There was every reason for the promoters to have a replacement guy ready, and there was every reason for Ugas to spar a southpaw.

      You're an absolute mark if you think Pacquiao didn't know there was an explicit possibility he'd be fighting Ugas. He's been around, he knew why Ugas was on the card. And the same would have applied to Spence if Pacquiao had been the one to pull out.
      You're still crying about that? Lmfao we went over this it was. And did you have those paragraphs ready? Lmfao

      Who was the other poster that called you out?


      Then you got so butthurt you claimed pac was on steroids which is completely irrelevant to the topic fvkcing loser

      Comment

      • famicommander
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2018
        • 9906
        • 5,462
        • 1
        • 49,546

        #13
        Originally posted by Grandma Lover

        You're still crying about that? Lmfao we went over this it was. And did you have those paragraphs ready? Lmfao

        Who was the other poster that called you out?


        Then you got so butthurt you claimed pac was on steroids which is completely irrelevant to the topic fvkcing loser
        You clearly have no grasp on basic reality. We went over this? Yeah, we did, and you were proven to have no idea what you were talking about.

        If you think Pacquiao didn't understand when he signed up for the fight that he may end up fighting Ugas, you're beyond help.
        If you think Spence didn't understand when he signed up for the fight that he may end up fighting Uhas, you're beyond help.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP