Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Anthony Joshua in talks for two-fight deal, Jared Anderson and Dillian Whyte 'discussed'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    Your wall of text is all over the place and barely coherent. Take a breath you moron.

    So for clarity here, your position is the guy that the entire boxing world said Fury was blatantly ducking, In Usyk, is actually in your reality someone that Fury cherrypicked?

    This is your stance?

    And you're asking me if i'm retarded? Are you sure your parents are not siblings?


    As for Hagler, I must touch on this, as you were clearly not alive when those fighters were fighting each other because it was extremely well known that Leonard had no interest in fighting Hagler until he looked beatable vs Mugabi. He even admits that HIMSELF you dumb fuck

    Every point you've attempted to make is as good as brain dead and objectively incorrect.

    You've got no clue what you're talking about and should quit while you're miles behind.
    Wall of text, it's literally a sentence at a time!? Imbecile.

    Do you lack reading comprehension or something, I specifically stated he waited until after the Dubois fight to fight him, allegedly reaffirming his weakness to the body.

    Fury could've of fought him instead of Chisora, Ngannou both of those fights are superseded by undisputed.

    Instead he waited for him to take more damage (see above) and potentially slow down.

    It's not cherrypicking per se as I said it's walking the tight rope...

    What have I said that wasn't a fact -

    Yes because Hagler looking beatable makes any difference to him having been out the ring for 3 years on drugs and alcohol and jumping straight into elite opposition, right!? bit of critical thinking on your part wouldn't go amiss.

    Hatton wasn't a belt holder, he previously held a belt at 47, didn't at the time of fighting Floyd that's definitionally not a belt holder. ​ (if you can even call winning a elevated champions belt a real belt, particularly when they didn't defend it)

    Pacman - like I said Brandon Rios lost to Alvarado then fought Pac right after, Bradley shouldn't of won the first fight so shouldn't of gotten the second and Algeri barely got by Provodnikov...

    Victor Ortiz​ - Like I said not only was he bounced off the ring twice he was literally MD to Peterson and moving up in weight to beat what you claim is a great 47 fighter give your head a wobble.

    P.S. The SRL point is even more poignant when you think Fury came back to fight seferi seferi or w/e he was called coming out of his drug and alcohol hiatus
    Last edited by Boro; Yesterday, 12:35 PM. Reason: P.S.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Boro View Post

      Wall of text, it's literally a sentence at a time!? Imbecile.

      Do you lack reading comprehension or something, I specifically stated he waited until after the Dubois fight to fight him, allegedly reaffirming his weakness to the body.

      Fury could've of fought him instead of Chisora, Ngannou both of those fights are superseded by undisputed.

      Instead he waited for him to take more damage (see above) and potentially slow down.

      It's not cherrypicking per se as I said it's walking the tight rope...

      What have I said that wasn't a fact -

      Yes because Hagler looking beatable makes any difference to him having been out the ring for 3 years on drugs and alcohol and jumping straight into elite opposition, right!? bit of critical thinking on your part wouldn't go amiss.

      Hatton wasn't a belt holder, he previously held a belt at 47, didn't at the time of fighting Floyd that's definitionally not a belt holder. ​ (if you can even call winning a elevated champions belt a real belt, particularly when they didn't defend it)

      Pacman - like I said Brandon Rios lost to Alvarado then fought Pac right after, Bradley shouldn't of won the first fight so shouldn't of gotten the second and Algeri barely got by Provodnikov...

      Victor Ortiz​ - Like I said not only was he bounced off the ring twice he was literally MD to Peterson and moving up in weight to beat what you claim is a great 47 fighter give your head a wobble.

      P.S. The SRL point is even more poignant when you think Fury came back to fight seferi seferi or w/e he was called coming out of his drug and alcohol hiatus
      "What have I said that's not a fact" You're so chronically out of touch with any kind of reality that it's comical. Almost every point you've attempted to make is the opposite of reality.

      You've tried to double down on the Hagler point again, what part of the FACT that Leonard openly wanted nothing to do with Hagler until he had a poor showing vs Mugabi are you lost on? Isn't that the EXACT point you're trying to make in regards to Floyd's career? That he "waited out opponents" or "fought them coming off poor performances" or are you just too galactically stupid to realise that?

      Pacquaio was universally considered the 2nd best fighter in the world P4P at that time. You consider that a cherry pick

      You're trying to argue Victor Ortiz was coming off a "terrible performance" when he was coming off an upset win over the #2 WW in the world to win the WBC title whilst moving up in weight.

      The points you're attempting to make are not only objectively false but they're flat out retarded.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

        "What have I said that's not a fact" You're so chronically out of touch with any kind of reality that it's comical. Almost every point you've attempted to make is the opposite of reality.

        You've tried to double down on the Hagler point again, what part of the FACT that Leonard openly wanted nothing to do with Hagler until he had a poor showing vs Mugabi are you lost on? Isn't that the EXACT point you're trying to make in regards to Floyd's career? That he "waited out opponents" or "fought them coming off poor performances" or are you just too galactically stupid to realise that?

        Pacquaio was universally considered the 2nd best fighter in the world P4P at that time. You consider that a cherry pick

        You're trying to argue Victor Ortiz was coming off a "terrible performance" when he was coming off an upset win over the #2 WW in the world to win the WBC title whilst moving up in weight.

        The points you're attempting to make are not only objectively false but they're flat out retarded.
        No I'm not doubling down on anything I'm just stating the facts, I didn't mention "the 4 kings" you did.

        They were constantly fighting high level fighters in their prime including each other unlike Floyd (well at least beyond 135), that was why I said don't compare them...

        Again the fact I have to reiterate that SRL was coming out of a 3 year drug and alcohol hiatus is quite frankly alarming.

        Pacquiaio run of fights was mediocre going into the fight and Floyd delayed the fight as long as humanly possible, the fact you're even trying to defend Floyd is laughable.

        If the #2 welterweight is getting beat by someone mediocre as Ortiz when he's moving up in weight and coming off the terrible performance against Lamont it goes to show how little him being #2 means, regardless of your prattle.

        Not only that when Ortiz was almost even money, he in no way getting an "upset win" or a "massive underdog" as you tried to imply previously.

        The fact he was even close to even money coming off a majority draw and moving up in weight, speaks more to how bad the bookies and the sporting world in general viewed Berto at the time.

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP