WBC President REVEALS Pacquiao ranking was a MISTAKE!

[The Big Dunn]

That fight was pretty competitive up until the ko. Just like any other Manny/Marquez fight.

Same with Horn.

Same with Bradley.

You can't put Manny and Spence in the same category on any level

Yes you can. He got ktfo just like Spence. All that matters.

He therefore is a bogus #1 same as you said Spence was.

Use the same standard to evaluate every boxer. Not the Manny pole smoker standard.

[djtmal]

Yes you can.

No you can't but Lord knows you will try

Just like you tried to get Crawford more sympathy votes in a poll he was losing in a landslide

Manny is a p4p goat

[The Big Dunn]

No you can't but Lord knows you will try

Just like you tried to get Crawford more sympathy votes in a poll he was losing in a landslide

Manny is a p4p goat

He got ktfo just like Spence. All that matters.

He therefore is a bogus #1 same as you said Spence was.

Use the same standard to evaluate every boxer. Not the Manny pole smoker standard.

[djtmal]

He got ktfo just like Spence. All that matters.

;

Lol. After three fights and he fought like the champ that's why he gets the respect.

Spence couldn't land a punch and is a bogus hypejob

I almost forgot who I was talking to the spokesperson for mediocrity

[Bennyleonard99]

No Spence didn't just lose. He got the brakes beat off him and was out of there before the championship rounds.

Bogus #1 ww

Spence is a dead asset with no leverage, no value. He's cooked. The general perception is he's totally shot from the Bud beating and the car crash.

[djtmal]

Use the same standard to evaluate every boxer..

Lol. Manny IS the standard. From Flyweight up to Junior Middle. One of the p4p goats get some tissue

[Bennyleonard99]

Yes you can. He got ktfo just like Spence. All that matters.

He therefore is a bogus #1 same as you said Spence was.

Use the same standard to evaluate every boxer. Not the Manny pole smoker standard.

Manny is the goat. To fight and win eight world titles in eight divisions is taking a lot of risks. Also his fighting style to give fans an electric show and always going for the exciting knockouts was a risky style, one that Mayweather didn't have the guts to dare to try and fight. 8 titles in 8 divisions is unheard of and will never happen again. Manny is the goat. Sure he had some mistakes and losses but that's gonna happen when you fight like a fearless lion vs the best in 8 divisions. Floyd fought like a wimp, careful and cautious and fear. And his duck list is incomparable.

[The Big Dunn]

Spence is a dead asset with no leverage, no value. He's cooked. The general perception is he's totally shot from the Bud beating and the car crash.

At this point I think this is a reasonable opinion.

He would need to look great in a comeback fight then beat a serious contender to be taken seriously by the public again.

[djtmal]

Spence is a dead asset with no leverage, no value. He's cooked. The general perception is he's totally shot from the Bud beating and the car crash.

Absolutely I can see if he was on top for years and years but we talking a 30 something with 28 fights no wars already cooked

[The Big Dunn]

Manny is the goat. To fight and win eight world titles in eight divisions is taking a lot of risks. Also his fighting style to give fans an electric show and always going for the exciting knockouts was a risky style, one that Mayweather didn't have the guts to dare to try and fight. 8 titles in 8 divisions is unheard of and will never happen again. Manny is the goat. Sure he had some mistakes and losses but that's gonna happen when you fight like a fearless lion vs the best in 8 divisions. Floyd fought like a wimp, careful and cautious and fear. And his duck list is incomparable.

We can agree to disagree on goat.

You appear to be a solid poster but don’t play yourself like this.

Don’t pretend Floyd post his hand injury retirement fought like that his whole career. You lose all integrity when you do.

Margs at 151 wasn’t a risk. Hatton post Floyd wasn’t a risk. ODH at 147 wasn’t a risk. Cotto was a risk, mitigated a bit by 145.

All I am asking is that the same standard be used to evaluate every boxer equally.

If boxer A didn’t fight boxer B and it’s called a duck, cool. Don’t them get mad when other posters call it a duck when boxer A is manny. I think that is fair. Do you?

Floyd fought differently when he returned from his hand injury. No question. You think the Shane fight was how a wimp fights? Stop it dude.

Maybe you are not who I thought. I see you’re a new poster. Were you banned for racism?