Thurman has very underrated resume

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MikeyMike100
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2020
    • 1231
    • 282
    • 1,472
    • 6,921

    #71
    Originally posted by hugh grant
    Off the top of my head all I remember is thurman being the no1 WW, and some way bud and spence overtook thurman without having to fight him?
    Thurman kind of dropped the ball vs Pacquiao

    Comment

    • MikeyMike100
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2020
      • 1231
      • 282
      • 1,472
      • 6,921

      #72
      I agree Thurman is underrated historically

      Comment

      • djtmal
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 12271
        • 1,200
        • 11
        • 39,097

        #73
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza

        Well you should because it directly breaks down why the point you're trying to make is extremely stupid.
        No I will pass on that. Spence was allegedly #1 at ww when he got the brakes beat off him.

        After that he was and still is a hypejob

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 48371
          • 4,778
          • 266
          • 104,043

          #74
          Originally posted by djtmal

          No I will pass on that.
          Yeah, thought so you little bitch.

          Such a shriveling coward, it's embarrassing. Make all the claims, tell all the lies and never once address the response when called out. What a sad embarrssment you are.​


          Originally posted by djtmal
          Spence was allegedly #1 at ww when he got the brakes beat off him.
          He WAS #1, idiot. HE WAS RANKED #1. What do you not understand?

          Originally posted by djtmal
          After that he was and still is a hypejob
          Ok, so.....

          Was Hatton a hype job when he was #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

          Was Barrera a hype job when he was #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

          Was Joe Frazier a hype job when he was #1 when George Foreman beat him?

          Was George Foreman a hype job when he was #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

          Was Micheal Spinks a hype job when he was#1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

          Was Anontio Margarito a hype job when he was #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

          Was **** Tiger a hype job when he was #1 when Bob Foster beat him?

          All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights? No obviously it doesn't. What part of that don't you understand? It's beyond bizarre and retarded.




          And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

          NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 10TH time of asking. TENTH

          I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.​​​

          Are you going to address the blatant lie you've told there or not?​

          Comment

          • MalevolentBite
            Objective Opinions Only
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2024
            • 1680
            • 592
            • 247
            • 0

            #75
            One Time was the man at 147lb until those Injuries. Spence got famous beating up on Thurmans left overs.

            He dropped the ball against Pac-Man though.

            Comment

            • djtmal
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 12271
              • 1,200
              • 11
              • 39,097

              #76
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza

              Yeah, thought so;
              Yeah right just admit Spence was a hypejob

              Has Spence even fought since he got the brakes beat off him
              Last edited by djtmal; 05-20-2025, 04:17 PM.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 48371
                • 4,778
                • 266
                • 104,043

                #77
                Originally posted by djtmal

                Yeah right just admit Spence was a hypejob

                Has Spence even fought since he got the brakes beat off him
                Yeah right, what? Do you just say random things when totally emasculated and have no response? What are you saying yeah right to?



                Ok so if Spence is a hype job...

                Was Hatton a hype job when he was #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

                Was Barrera a hype job when he was #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

                Was Joe Frazier a hype job when he was #1 when George Foreman beat him?

                Was George Foreman a hype job when he was #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

                Was Micheal Spinks a hype job when he was#1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

                Was Anontio Margarito a hype job when he was #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

                Was **** Tiger a hype job when he was #1 when Bob Foster beat him?

                All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights? No obviously it doesn't. What part of that don't you understand? It's beyond bizarre and retarded.




                And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

                NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 12TH time of asking.

                I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.​​​

                Are you going to address the blatant lie you've told there or not?​​

                Comment

                • djtmal
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 12271
                  • 1,200
                  • 11
                  • 39,097

                  #78
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                  Yeah right, what? Do you just say random things when totally emasculated and have no response? What are you saying yeah right to?



                  Ok so if Spence is a hype job...

                  Was Hatton a hype job when he was #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

                  Was Barrera a hype job when he was #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

                  Was Joe Frazier a hype job when he was #1 when George Foreman beat him?

                  Was George Foreman a hype job when he was #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

                  Was Micheal Spinks a hype job when he was#1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

                  Was Anontio Margarito a hype job when he was #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

                  Was **** Tiger a hype job when he was #1 when Bob Foster beat him?

                  All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights? No obviously it doesn't. What part of that don't you understand? It's beyond bizarre and retarded.




                  And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

                  NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 12TH time of asking.

                  I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.​​​

                  Are you going to address the blatant lie you've told there or not?​​
                  Right now we discussing Errol Spence being a bogus #1 welterweight

                  Comment

                  • IronDanHamza
                    BoxingScene Icon
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 48371
                    • 4,778
                    • 266
                    • 104,043

                    #79
                    Originally posted by djtmal

                    Right now we discussing Errol Spence being a bogus #1 welterweight
                    Ok, so if Spence was a "bogus" #1 WW...

                    Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

                    Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

                    Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

                    Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

                    Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

                    Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

                    Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

                    All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?

                    Why don't you try ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS?




                    And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

                    NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 13THtime of asking.

                    I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.​​​

                    Are you going to address the blatant lie you've told there or not?​​ Why don't you try ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS?​

                    Comment

                    • Teetotaler23
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Apr 2025
                      • 191
                      • 65
                      • 15
                      • 0

                      #80
                      Originally posted by daggum

                      Ugas beat pac coming off a win over Thurman. Isn't this thread talking about how good Thurman was?

                      Ugas also should have gotten tbe decision over porter. he was clearly one of the best fighters in the Division.

                      Brook lost a fight not even in his division. Think you are emphasizing the fact that he lost far more than you are overlooking how good he was at 147.
                      Ugas beat pac cause a switcharoo thats it. Ugas was training for a southpaw even though his opponent was right handed

                      never said brook wasnt good but being a big ww and moving up to MW then moving back down isnt easy. Especially getting beat tf up moving back down

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP