Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I really hope the Pacquiao-Barrios fight doesn’t happen.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IronDanHamza
    replied
    Originally posted by famicommander View Post

    Again, you can act incredulous all you want. But you know exactly why he ducked the drug testing. Period.
    You can keep repeating it, it won’t make it true.

    NOBODY knows the reason why he didn’t do the drug testing procedure. There could be a million and one reasons why. Is it suspect? Yes I would personally say it is. But you can’t just assert that that equates to him being a PED user because it objectively does not. It doesn’t matter how many times you repeat it, it won’t magically make it true.

    I’ll ask you again since you’ve avoided the question 3 times now. If you are claiming Manny Pacquaio is a “drug cheat”……WHAT DRUG?

    Leave a comment:


  • IronDanHamza
    replied
    Originally posted by Smash View Post

    im a bit confused

    time his cycle? would the cycle not have to be ongoing in the months running up to the fight where full testing is in operation? if he was taking something he would surely be caught
    Well firstly no he wouldn’t be surely caught. It’s not difficult to beat a random drug testing protcol without a cut off date, let alone with one.

    With one? There’s no point. The chances of beating it are so astronomically likely there is no point in doing it.

    As for timing. Months? No, probably not months. Depends on the athlete. The point is they know the date of the cut off for all testing. Meaning they can time it around that with their masking procedures and whatever else the team has in place (if they were to be using PEDs)

    Leave a comment:


  • famicommander
    replied
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    Yes you are. You can’t honestly think that that isn’t abundantly clear?

    You’ve just asserted what the reason was, you don’t know what the reason was and there could be a plethora of them. It’s not an admission of guilt. I’m not even sure you know what that is.

    If Pacquauo is a drug cheat like you are claiming he is, what drug is it?
    Again, you can act incredulous all you want. But you know exactly why he ducked the drug testing. Period.

    Leave a comment:


  • Smash
    replied
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    It quite literally defeats the entire point of doing the testing procedure. If there’s a cut off date, there is no point doing the procedure at all because you can time your cycle around the specified cut off date.

    It’s as good as useless with a cut off date.
    im a bit confused

    time his cycle? would the cycle not have to be ongoing in the months running up to the fight where full testing is in operation? if he was taking something he would surely be caught

    Leave a comment:


  • IronDanHamza
    replied
    Originally posted by Smash View Post

    i wouldnt quite say totally defeat the point of it, it would give pac a window of 10 days to take 'something' that wouldnt show up in urine and would be out of his blood for the post fight blood test as well, this substance also would not be able to be taken throughout the entire run up to the fight as full tests were on, im not an expert in the area but that sounds quite limiting to me anyway
    It quite literally defeats the entire point of doing the testing procedure. If there’s a cut off date, there is no point doing the procedure at all because you can time your cycle around the specified cut off date.

    It’s as good as useless with a cut off date.

    Leave a comment:


  • IronDanHamza
    replied
    Originally posted by famicommander View Post

    I'm not new to boxing, I was following the story as it happened, and it's absolutely an admission of guilt. And, once again, you absolutely know it. You just don't want to admit it.

    This isn't a court of law. They're not going to punish Pacquiao if you admit what you know is the truth. He ducked the biggest possible fight over drug testing, and the reason for that is because he knew he'd fail. It's okay to admit it. Everyone knows.
    Yes you are. You can’t honestly think that that isn’t abundantly clear?

    You’ve just asserted what the reason was, you don’t know what the reason was and there could be a plethora of them. It’s not an admission of guilt. I’m not even sure you know what that is.

    If Pacquauo is a drug cheat like you are claiming he is, what drug is it?
    Last edited by IronDanHamza; 05-10-2025, 02:54 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • HisExcellency
    replied
    50yo Pac SMASHES him...Barrios is nothing special and effectively a paper champion who's lost every time he's stepped up in competition.

    Why else do you think Pac's chasing him specifically as opposed to Boots & Norman who also hold belts lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • Smash
    replied
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



    Pacquaio agreed to the testing but only with a cut off date. Which does totally defeat the entire point of doing random drug testing in the first place.
    .
    i wouldnt quite say totally defeat the point of it, it would give pac a window of 10 days to take 'something' that wouldnt show up in urine and would be out of his blood for the post fight blood test as well, this substance also would not be able to be taken throughout the entire run up to the fight as full tests were on, im not an expert in the area but that sounds quite limiting to me anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • famicommander
    replied
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    He’s new to boxing so wouldn’t understand the context of it being brand new at the time (random drug testing protocol)

    Pacquaio agreed to the testing but only with a cut off date. Which does totally defeat the entire point of doing random drug testing in the first place.

    But it’s neither here nor there, its still neither an admission of guilt or a evidence of Pacquaio using PEDs.

    It is a reason to be suspicous and nothing more.
    I'm not new to boxing, I was following the story as it happened, and it's absolutely an admission of guilt. And, once again, you absolutely know it. You just don't want to admit it.

    This isn't a court of law. They're not going to punish Pacquiao if you admit what you know is the truth. He ducked the biggest possible fight over drug testing, and the reason for that is because he knew he'd fail. It's okay to admit it. Everyone knows.
    Last edited by famicommander; 05-10-2025, 02:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • IronDanHamza
    replied
    Originally posted by Smash View Post

    ive forgotten a lot of that stuff but didnt pac agree to drug testing he just said he didnt like blood drawn close to a fight so wanted a cutoff date for blood taken, 10 days or something before fight with as much urine tests as they like and blood test right after the fight, floyd had agreed to it at one point but then changed his mind, so there was 2 of them at it i remember, then floyd went on his hols

    remember the context of all of this too, this was i think the first boxing match that such demands were made of a fighter, it wasnt standard stuff at that point, the deal they had to fight was very reasonable i thought
    He’s new to boxing so wouldn’t understand the context of it being brand new at the time (random drug testing protocol)

    Pacquaio agreed to the testing but only with a cut off date. Which does totally defeat the entire point of doing random drug testing in the first place.

    But it’s neither here nor there, its still neither an admission of guilt or a evidence of Pacquaio using PEDs.

    It is a reason to be suspicous and nothing more.
    Smash Smash likes this.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP