Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

People really think "this version" of Canelo is better than 154 Canelo?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Scull showed Bivol level movement without the offense. If more offense he would get knocked out but was a proficient mover. Crawford still has no chance. Maybe Canelo had purpously a bad performance to sell the Craw fight better, people have memories as goldfish anyway.

    Comment


    • #12
      TBF, and I'm not defending Canelo in general, he's old and nearly 70 fights in and I don't know how many removed from 154 in years or fights; too lazy to look. Of course he looked better at 154.

      Whether he wants to look in the mirror and face facts, he also took a shellacking from Bivol that no doubt shaved some years.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Floyd is TBE View Post
        Because this current "version" of Canelo is a washed up husk of his former self. 154 Canelo was my favorite. He was a beast that fought everybody. 168 Canelo is a pathetic excuse for a fighter. He beat all that Euro trash DAZN cherrypicked for him and had some of y'all fooled.
        So you saying floyd fought the best version of Nelo? lol I'm sure Nell learnt from loss, and was better in his very next fight

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

          So you saying floyd fought the best version of Nelo? lol I'm sure Nell learnt from loss, and was better in his very next fight
          He was not better. Just his 168 opposition ******.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post

            He was not better. Just his 168 opposition ******.
            His 168 opposition wasn't the best. But he struggled with trout back then, and it was a cw with floyd

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP