Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What was Vitali boxing style ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Dude was a beast, but truth is, he was difficult to hit because he was 6'7.

    Average height of heavies in the early 2000s was 6'3. That's the same as tiny Usyk now. But 6'7 would still be big in today's world.

    Comment


    • #12
      Complete fighter. Not all fighters, can be classed as just ONE kind of style i.e. Lennox Lewis, Evander Holyfield and potentially Vitali Kiltschko 'Were overall complete fighters. When a fighter is regarded as a complete fighter, it means they have the ability to fight in all areas of boxing. Inside Game, Mid Range Game, Long Range Game and Rough House tactics. Out of those three fighters I have just mentioned, Lennox Lewis and Evander Holyfield are skill for skill better superior fighters than Vitali Kiltschko but? Kiltschko still had the ability to fight in all areas of Boxing'.

      Wladimir Kiltschko was not quite the complete fighter Vitali Kiltschko was 'But Wladimir Kiltschko was a superior Long to Mid Range Boxer than Vitali Kiltschko. It does not necessarily mean, when a fighter is a complete fighter that they are superior to all other fighters'.

      In today's Heavyweight era 'The only two real complete Heavyweight fighters, with all round game are Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua. I would Tyson Fury's all round game is better and more balanced than Anthony Joshua's. But? Joshua does have the potential to negate this, due to having individually superior attributes to Tyson Fury i.e. Joshua's power and offensively capabilities are by far superior to Tyson Fury's. And even if Fury is marginally better than Joshua in other areas of boxing, it is not by a very far margin. This is now very clear, as a direct comparison can be made of how each fighter has performed against common opponents'.

      For the most part 'Anthony Joshua has been able to beat common opponents with Tyson Fury, in more conclusion and brutal fashion. Anthony Joshua knocked out Wladimir Kiltschko and forced him into retirement, knocked out an unbeaten and better version of Dillian Whyte, scored a stoppage inside 6 rounds against Otto Wallin, and he completely obliterated Francis Ngannou who in reality beat Tyson Fury over 10 rounds'.

      Both Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua fought 24 rounds vs Oleksandr Uysk I & II 'The statistics in their performances, show there can be a debate made that Anthony Joshua overall fought better fights vs Uysk I & II'.

      Note: Oleksandr Uysk had to produce a higher work rate vs Anthony Joshua in both fights 'But still he landed less punches on Anthony Joshua, which he did on Tyson Fury. Anthony Joshua was never at no point, hurt by Uysk like the way Fury was in their first fight. And overall Anthony Joshua did seem to manage the pace of a better version of Oleksandr Uysk than Tyson Fury. The highest amount of punches Oleksandr Uysk landed on Tyson Fury was 179 punches. Out of a total of 423 punches thrown, this was during their second fight. The Highest amount of punches Oleksandr Uysk landed on Anthony Joshua was 170 punches. Out of a total of 712 punches thrown, this was during their second fight. Anthony Joshua landed 123 punches on Oleksandr Uysk in both fights, Tyson Fury landed 144 punches in both fights vs Oleksandr Uysk I & II'.

      So as you can see up above 'Both Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua fought 24 rounds vs Oleksandr Uysk I & II. There is evidence in the action of the fights, which does suggest that Anthony Joshua is potentially skill for skill a better boxer than Tyson Fury. And even if certain folk in the boxing community don't think Joshua is a better skill for skill boxer? Then it is still very very close between the two fighters. There is just far too much relevant evidence and data, which proves that Tyson Fury is not miles better than Anthony Joshua and never has been as a fighter'.

      There is only one fight, when it comes to common opponents which you can possibly say Tyson Fury performed better than Anthony Joshua 'And that is against Wladimir Kiltschko. But? Even that performance is not unequivocally superior. Anthony Joshua fought a more engaging and violent fight vs a better prepared and more motivated Wladimir Kiltschko. Joshua's win ultimately was more conclusive than Fury's, it was Anthony Joshua who knocked out Wladimir Kiltschko and forced him into retirement not Tyson Fury'.

      To conclude: So overall, on the topic of Vitali Kiltschko 'He was a complete fighter. And had the ability to fight in all areas if boxing. I don't think you can class certain fighters as just one style. Most top level fighters have the ability to fight in all areas of boxing, but? In their biggest fights, they have to rely more on their best attributes. Mike Tyson did not go through all of his opponents like a locomotive train, Tyson has out boxed elite level fighters such as Tony Tucker in 1987' etc.
      Last edited by PRINCEKOOL; 04-20-2025, 07:21 AM.
      WillieWild114 WillieWild114 likes this.

      Comment

      Working...
      X
      TOP