Meanwhile Thurman proved he was the best ww when he fought Manny, and now after a loss.
Write boxrec and tell them you was misinformed
Show me one post where I have citied Boxrec.
Your position is Thurman proved he was the best WW by LOSING to someone who wasn't in the Top 3 at WW at the time and then hasn't beaten a ranked WW since and hasn't beaten a ranked WW in 8 years? That makes sense
Pac's Murderer's Row -
Clottey
Cotto Lite
DONE La Hoya
Shot AF Mararito
Baby Margarito
Alcherry
Vargas
Lucas
Almost Bumlevel
Super Shot Mosley
Timmeh 3x ( )
JMM 2x (life and mostly death)
HORN (CPGW)
Basic AF Ugas
Pac would have needed to beat someone like Sometime 10x to make that shlt look kinda respectable
Your position is Thurman proved he was the best WW by LOSING to someone who wasn't in the Top 3 at WW at the time and then hasn't beaten a ranked WW since and hasn't beaten a ranked WW in 8 years? That makes sense
I said Thurman was the best ww in the world at the time he fought Manny keep up
You saying it was Spence because you loyal to boxrec, but losing the way he did showed that he was a hypejob and your source boxrec was wrong
Lol. Where do I start your boy Maskingagentweather's pops said that same Done La Hoya beat his son, and Maskingagentweather ducked Margarito altogether
Lol. Where do I start your boy Maskingagentweather's pops said that same Done La Hoya beat his son, and Maskingagentweather ducked Margarito altogether
Your God signed off on that contract
Only you Pac bois and haters cry about something that everyone agreed to.
Now, remind me, why do you refuse to vote in that would you or wouldn't you poll ?!?!?!?
Pacquiao and its not close.
Cotto, Clottey, Bradley 2-3X, and Thurman were all TOP 5 WWs when he defeated them.
Thurman is comparable to Spence. Maybe Clottey to Porter.
The rest are B or C level type of fighters
Edit: I was in a hurry when i posted that. Adding more context to this.
DLH and JMM were both great wins as well but this is more of a Top P4P wins. Nothing to compare for Crawford really.
Pacquaio had Mosley, Mathysse and Broner, while Crawford had Khan and Brook. These fighters were at the top 5 of their divisions (WW or lower) during their primes but clearly not the best anymore when they met Pacquaio and Crawford.
Pacquaio other top 10 wins like Vargas is equivalent to Crawford win over Benavides Jr. and Kava
Lower rated/level oppenents
Pacquaio had wins over Algeiri and Rios. (Also Horn)
Crawford had wins over Horn (Who got his rankings by the Pacquaio robbery). Horn achieved nothing after his fluke win against Pac.
Pacquaio losses in WW were against two ATGs Marquez and Floyd, and Ugas when Pac was 42 years old. All competitive fights. Horn and Bradley were both clear robberies.
Against past prime and lower rank fighters they are pretty similiar but Pacquaio had like 6-7 best wins (including Marquez and DLH) better than Crawford 2 best wins in WW.
Neither of those were better wins at 147 than Spence. Marquez was not better at 147 than Spence or as good. He was soundly beaten and dominated at 147 by Mayweather and Bradley. Delahoya was clearly finished as a fighter when he faced Pacquiao and fighting at 147 completely drained him at that stage. Spence was a far better win than either one
Comment