Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?
Collapse
-
If Errol Spence is a hype job, then what does that make Thurman? Spence has a better resume than Thurman.Comment
-
Are you listening to yourself? Everything you've JUST SAID about Spence can be said about Thurman between 2017-2019 you retard. They are carbon copies of one another in that regard.
If Errol Spence is a hype job, then what does that make Thurman? Spence has a better resume than Thurman.
Fought twice and won twice as well since the Manny lossLast edited by djtmal; 05-07-2025, 02:59 PM.Comment
-
Spence has proved beyond repute that he is not a hype job, that's retarded. He has a better resume than Thurman and has had a better career than Thurman.
He lost one fight to arguably the best fighter in the world. If that makes you a hypejob then Thurman is an even bigger hype job.Comment
-
The best ww in the world couldn't win a round and gets stopped before the 10th okComment
-
He hadn't beaten a ranked fighter in 28 months and in the one fight he had he was out of his feet and scraped a split decison agasint an unranked Lopez
If Spence is a hypejob, Thurman is the hype job of the century.
Your argument is, as per usual, flat out retarded.Comment
-
Thurman wouldn't even get in the ring with Crawford so we don't know if he'd land a punch either.
You're an idiot. Plain and simple. Spence has a better resume than Thurman so to call Spence a hype job all you're doing is calling Thurman a bigger one.Comment
-
You just in denial about Thurman being the best ww when Manny fought him.
Spence was a fluke. Has that boy even been in the gym since he lostComment
Comment