Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?
Collapse
-
-
You keep diverting and avoiding discussing facts because deep down you know Crawford had the better ww resume.Comment
-
Comment
-
Lol @ the 3 blind mice who think that Crawford had a better career at Welterweight than Pacquiao. Luckily, common sense prevails and 37 user realise that Pacquiao has the FAR superior resume.
Pacquiao took a PRIME undefeated Bradley's cherry twice (should've really been 3 times) and Thurman's too aged 40yo. In comparison, Crawford beat Spence post life-changing car crash and years of hard partying!Comment
-
Crawford's CV:-
Spence (post life-changing car crash & years of hard partying)
Porter (post 3 losses)
Khan (post 4 losses & 3 KO's)
Brook (post 2 KO's and having both eye sockets broken)
Benavidez Jr (BUM)
Avenesyan (BUM)
Mean Machine (BUM)
Horn (BUM - this bum got a hometown decision against Manny who outlanded him 11 rounds to 1 and 182 vs. 92 punches overall according to CompuBox)
Yep...Bud definitely has the BETTER CV at Welterweight!Comment
-
-
Crawford's CV:-
Spence (post life-changing car crash & years of hard partying)
Porter (post 3 losses)
Khan (post 4 losses & 3 KO's)
Brook (post 2 KO's and having both eye sockets broken)
Benavidez Jr (BUM)
Avenesyan (BUM)
Mean Machine (BUM)
Horn (BUM - this bum got a hometown decision against Manny who outlanded him 11 rounds to 1 and 182 vs. 92 punches overall according to CompuBox)
Yep...Bud definitely has the BETTER CV at Welterweight!
Khan is his most legit scalp other than SpenceComment
-
They wouldn't have too many common opponents being that they are from two different eras now would they and the one that they do, Manny was clearly robbed
Last edited by djtmal; 04-23-2025, 12:14 PM.Comment
Comment