Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post



    Stop making excuses because Manny didn’t accomplish what Crawford did and lost to the common opponent.
    Manny with the loss to Marquez, laps Crawford

    He beat higher caliber fighters, been in far more higher profile fights, and the whole nine

    Crawford had a decent ww run nothing special though. A shopworn Amir Khan and it gets worse from there
    Last edited by djtmal; 04-23-2025, 01:37 PM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

      That means diddly jack if Manny beat higher caliber fighters, which we already proved that he did
      Name value. Yes. But out of prime and past it, like Manny against Ugas according to you.

      Same standard for everyone.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post



        Stop whining because you know a complete analysis puts Crawford ahead. Manny only wins when we limit it to name value wins.
        Well start a complete analysis thread for Crawford so you can suck him off thoroughly

        Comment


        • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post



          Same standard for everyone.
          Naw Manny didn't get his hand raised after a lowblow

          Comment


          • Originally posted by HisExcellency View Post

            Pacquiao took a PRIME undefeated Bradley's cherry twice (should've really been 3 times) and Thurman's too aged 40yo. In comparison, Crawford beat Spence post life-changing car crash and years of hard partying!
            According to Big Dunn, unifying against 3 c fighters is better. Because Manny didn't do that. Lol
            Last edited by djtmal; 04-23-2025, 03:05 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

              Name value. Yes..
              You wish

              Comment


              • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                According to Big Dunn, unifying against 3 c fighters is better. Because Manny didn't do that. Lol
                No according to Big Dunn, Crawford unified the 4 belts at ww. Manny didn’t. That is a fact.

                Manny failed at his attempt to unify the 4 belts by beating the top ww.

                Just because Crawford accomplished something Manny failed at doesn’t mean you should minimize it. That’s ph@ggoty and weak.

                Dont forget, common opponents Crawford beat Horn, Manny lost to Horn.
                Last edited by The Big Dunn; 04-23-2025, 03:57 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                  You wish
                  You left out the part the name guys were out of prime and past it, like Manny against Ugas according to you.

                  Same standards.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                    No according to Big Dunn, Crawford unified the 4 belts at ww. Manny didn’t. That is a fact.

                    .
                    Don't matter because Manny still had the better career.

                    Comment


                    • Terence Bud Crawford and by a lot
                      TheProudLunatic TheProudLunatic likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP