Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?

[The Big Dunn]

That means diddly jack if Manny beat higher caliber fighters, which we already proved that he did

Name value. Yes. But out of prime and past it, like Manny against Ugas according to you.

Same standard for everyone.

[djtmal]

Stop whining because you know a complete analysis puts Crawford ahead. Manny only wins when we limit it to name value wins.

Well start a complete analysis thread for Crawford so you can suck him off thoroughly

[djtmal]

Same standard for everyone.

Naw Manny didn't get his hand raised after a lowblow

[djtmal]

Pacquiao took a PRIME undefeated Bradley's cherry twice (should've really been 3 times) and Thurman's too aged 40yo. In comparison, Crawford beat Spence post life-changing car crash and years of hard partying!

According to Big Dunn, unifying against 3 c fighters is better. Because Manny didn't do that. Lol

[djtmal]

Name value. Yes..

You wish

[The Big Dunn]

According to Big Dunn, unifying against 3 c fighters is better. Because Manny didn't do that. Lol

No according to Big Dunn, Crawford unified the 4 belts at ww. Manny didn’t. That is a fact.

Manny failed at his attempt to unify the 4 belts by beating the top ww.

Just because Crawford accomplished something Manny failed at doesn’t mean you should minimize it. That’s ph@ggoty and weak.

Dont forget, common opponents Crawford beat Horn, Manny lost to Horn.

[The Big Dunn]

You wish

You left out the part the name guys were out of prime and past it, like Manny against Ugas according to you.

Same standards.

[djtmal]

No according to Big Dunn, Crawford unified the 4 belts at ww. Manny didn’t. That is a fact.

.

Don't matter because Manny still had the better career.

[MikeyMike100]

Terence Bud Crawford and by a lot

[djtmal]

You left out the part the name guys were out of prime and past it, like Manny against Ugas according to you.

;

Why waste time when 90% of the vote went to Manny.