Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    Refer to post #5 in this thread
    Easily isn't explaining sh"'t son

    Comment


    • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

      Who gives a s''t to both
      Yes you've made it very clear to everyone you're not only an inbred retard but you also deny literal reality.

      "Who gives a shit" to the rankings that rank where the fighters are, you ask? You can't just say someone is the best because you feel like it, facts don't care about your feelings you fat basement dwelling inbred.

      He was ranked #3. Do you think #3 is the highest ranking you can get?
      The Big Dunn The Big Dunn likes this.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

        Now see son. This is your f'king problem right here son.

        Everybody in the thread read it, and accepted the parameters for what it was and responded accordingly.

        You the only one that had a problem with it because simply it puts Manny on top.

        So what do you want to do you want to change it more to your liking so you can s''t on Manny but son the poll isn’t changing, and Crawford has two votes. You do the same shot for your man crush illegalivweather

        Go start a Manny hate thread complete with poll so he can be on rock bottom where you will be most happy.
        And I asked the TS about the parameters. A fair and reasonable request given the question - who has a better ww resume- can’t be answered without analyzing their complete resumes.

        I didn’t sh-t on Manny in any way. I brought up his ww losses- part of his resume- not counting the Ugas or Bradley losses.

        I applied what you said about ODH- same name nothing changed- to Manny. That was the only time I counted the Ugas loss- because you changed the parameters because I asked about losses and you don’t want them to count.

        I never checked the poll results nor did I vote so that conspiracy theory is BS.

        Yes, I answer resume questions by looking at the whole resume. Only a pole smoking fan of a boxer thinks this is problematic.

        I didn’t hate on Manny at any point in this thread. I simply analyzed the whole resume.

        As usual, when anyone does that, you get mad because deep down Manny’s resume looks different in the light. You only see his resume staring at his waistline Washington his sack with your mouth.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

          Easily isn't explaining sh"'t son
          What, me saying the answer is "Pacquaio easily" isn't explaining anything? Can you legit not read?

          What do you think "Pacquaio easily" means in regards to this question being posed, DUMMY?

          You've also just said I lied about something in this thread.

          Please back up that claim and tell me what I'm supposed to have lied about.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

            Yes you've made it very clear to everyone you're not only an inbred retard but you also deny literal reality.
            You made it clear that you a card carrying Floyd boy when it comes to him excessively clinching opponents, and fighting 38 year old shopworns, but you'll flip flop on all your Floyd boy cronies when it comes to Floyd's illegal iv use
            Last edited by djtmal; 04-21-2025, 04:44 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

              What, me saying the answer is "Pacquaio easily" isn't explaining anything?
              Explain why Floyd boy

              You probably lying anyway

              Comment


              • Iron Dan is what they call a fair weather Floyd boy

                Comment


                • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                  Me too son. Thurman was the best ww in the world. Floyd ducked him and Manny beat him. It was a better win than a questionable Errol Spence for Crawford. Errol didn't even throw a punch.
                  He never was. The rankings show this. You desperately lie him to give Manny’s resume a boost.

                  Both Crawford and Spence were ranked ahead of him at ww. Additionally, Crawford was the #2 p4p boxer and Spence was #6 in Ring Magazine for July 2019 when Manny beat Thurman.

                  Thurman was no where to be found on the p4p rankings.
                  Last edited by The Big Dunn; 04-21-2025, 04:56 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                    You made it clear that you a card carrying Floyd boy when it comes to him excessively clinching opponents, but you'll flip flop on all your Floyd boy cronies when it comes to Floyd's illegal iv use
                    What? This is beyond incoherent.

                    No I don't "flip flop" I am what you call consistent and deal with the facts of the matter. Whether I am a fan of someone or not. So in regards to Floyd's use of an illegal IV, I call it how it is, which is overly suspect behavior. I know this because I actually know about that topic and field unlike 99% of people on here.

                    What that has to do with Floyd excessively clinching, I don't even know and I don't think you even know. At this point you're just spouting the first thing that comes to your head because you're getting battered worse than when your hilbilly daddy sexually abused you while his sister who also happens to be your fat whore of a mother watched.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                      And I asked the TS about the parameters.
                      For what just respond to how the ts put it

                      Did Crawford get 5 votes yet

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP